You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 158 No. 18, October 12, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Comparison of the Efficacy of Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers in African American Patients With Hypertension

W. Dallas Hall, MD; James W. Reed, MD; John M. Flack, MD, MPH; Carla Yunis, MD, MPH; John Preisser, PhD; and the ISHIB Investigators Group

Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:2029-2034.

Background  Hypertension is a prevalent disease among African Americans, and successful treatment rates are low. Since calcium channel blockers are well-tolerated and efficacious in African Americans, we undertook this study to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 3 commonly prescribed calcium channel blockers: amlodipine besylate (Norvasc), nifedipine coat core (CC) (Adalat CC), and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) (Procardia XL).

Methods  One hundred ninety-two hypertensive patients across 10 study centers were randomly assigned to double-blind monotherapy with amlodipine besylate (5 mg/d), nifedipine CC (30 mg/d), or nifedipine GITS (30 mg/d) for 8 weeks. Patients not achieving therapeutic response after 4 weeks had their dose doubled for the next 4 weeks. The primary end point was a comparison of the average reduction (week 8 minus baseline) in 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Secondary end points included a comparison of average 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP), office SBP or DBP reduction, responder rates, safety, and tolerability.

Results  One hundred sixty-three patients were evaluable for efficacy after 8 weeks. There was no significant difference in the average 24-hour ambulatory DBP (-8.5, -9.0, and -6.1 mm Hg, respectively) or SBP (-14.3, -15.7, and -11.8 mm Hg, respectively) reduction. Average office SBP and DBP were reduced to a comparable degree (19-22 mm Hg [P=.50] and 12-14 mm Hg [P=.51], respectively). Responder rates (DBP <90 or reduced by >=10 mm Hg) were similar (P=.38). Discontinuation rates and adverse event frequency were distributed similarly across the 3 treatment groups.

Conclusion  The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the 3 dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers are equivalent in African Americans with stages 1 and 2 hypertension.


From the Departments of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine (Dr Hall) and Morehouse School of Medicine (Dr Reed), Atlanta, Ga, and Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Mich (Dr Flack); and the Departments of Medicine (Dr Flack) and Public Health Sciences (Drs Yunis and Preisser), Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC. Participants in the ISHIB Investigators Group are listed in the acknowledgments at the end of this article. Drs Hall and Reed are members of the Bayer Cardiovascular Advisory Board.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The necessity for recognition and treatment of patients with "mild" hypertension
Frohlich
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1369-1377.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.