This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (50)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Thomas Bregenzer, MD; Dieter Conen, MD; Pascal Sakmann, MD; Andreas F. Widmer, MD, MS

Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:151-156.

Background  Guidelines developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga, recommend that peripheral intravenous catheters be changed every 3 days. However, routine replacement of central venous catheters is no longer supported in their latest update.

Objective  To evaluate the risk to patients of having peripheral intravenous catheters left in place for as long as they are clinically indicated.

Methods  This observational study in a university-affiliated, 700-bed hospital was designed to evaluate the day-specific risk (incidence density) for phlebitis, catheter infection, and obstruction with catheters remaining in place as long as clinically indicated. All consecutive patients who required peripheral intravenous catheterization for 24 hours or more were enrolled during a 10-week period. Outcome variables are phlebitis, catheter-related infections, and obstruction. Evaluated risk factors include age, sex, underlying disease, anatomical insertion site, catheter diameter, first or subsequent catheter, duration of catheterization, type of admission, hospital location, type of infusate, and antibiotic therapy.

Results  A total of 609 catheters that were in place for 1 to 28 days were evaluated. Phlebitis, catheter-related infection, and obstruction occurred in 19.7%, 6.9%, and 6.0% of catheters, respectively. We were unable to demonstrate an increased risk after 3 days of catheterization. The day-specific risk indicated a linear function of all outcome variables.

Conclusions  The hazard for catheter-related complications—phlebitis, catheter-related infections, and mechanical complications—did not increase during prolonged catheterization. The recommendation for routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters should be reevaluated considering the additional cost and discomfort to the patient.

From the Divisions of Infectious Diseases (Dr Bregenzer) and Clinical Epidemiology (Dr Widmer), University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; and the Department of Internal Medicine (Dr Conen) and the Bacteriology Laboratory (Dr Sakmann), Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Factors that affect longevity of intravenous cannulas: a prospective study
Dillon et al.
QJM 2008;101:731-735.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: randomised controlled trial
Webster et al.
BMJ 2008;337:a339-a339.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving the safety of peripheral intravenous catheters
Maki
BMJ 2008;337:a630-a630.
FULL TEXT  

The Risk of Bloodstream Infection in Adults With Different Intravascular Devices: A Systematic Review of 200 Published Prospective Studies
Maki et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:1159-1171.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intravenous therapy
Waitt et al.
Postgrad. Med. J. 2004;80:1-6.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Venous Thromboembolism Associated With Long-Term Use of Central Venous Catheters in Cancer Patients
Verso and Agnelli
JCO 2003;21:3665-3675.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The health professional's role in preventing nosocomial infections
Saloojee and Steenhoff
Postgrad. Med. J. 2001;77:16-19.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intravenous Catheters: To Change or Not To Change
JWatch Infect. Diseases 1998;1998:20-20.
FULL TEXT