 |
 |

Lifestyle and 15-Year Survival Free of Heart Attack, Stroke, and Diabetes in Middle-aged British Men
S. Goya Wannamethee, PhD;
A. Gerald Shaper, FRCP;
Mary Walker, MA;
Shah Ebrahim, FRCP
Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:2433-2440.
Background To examine the relationship between modifiable lifestyle factors (smoking, physical activity, alcohol intake, and body mass index [BMI]) and the likelihood of 15-year survival free of major cardiovascular end points and diabetes in middle-aged men.
Methods A prospective study of 7142 men aged 40 to 59 years at screening with no history of coronary heart disease, diabetes, and stroke drawn from 1 general practice in each of 24 British towns and followed up for 15 years.
Main Outcome Measures Death from any cause and a combined end point, including survival free of heart attacks or stroke or the development of diabetes over a follow-up of 15 years for each man.
Results During the 15-year follow-up, there were 1064 deaths from all causes, 770 major heart attacks (fatal and nonfatal), 247 stroke events (fatal and nonfatal), and 252 cases of diabetes among the 7142 men. After adjustment for age and each of the other modifiable lifestyle factors, the risk of the combined end point (death or having a heart attack, stroke, or diabetes) went up significantly with increasing smoking levels and from BMI levels of 26 kg/m2 or higher, and decreased significantly with increasing levels of physical activity up to levels of moderate activity with no further benefit thereafter (heavy smoking vs never: relative risk [RR] [odds], 2.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.12-2.94; BMI 30 vs 20-21.9 kg/m2: RR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.71-2.62; moderate vs inactive: RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.50-0.72). Light drinking (vs occasional) showed a relatively small but significant reduction in risk (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96). Using Cox predictive survival models, the estimated probability of surviving 15 years free of cardiovascular events and diabetes in a man aged 50 years ranged from 89% in a moderately active man at BMI levels of 20 to 24.0 kg/m2 who had never smoked to 42% in an inactive smoker with BMI level of 30 kg/m2 or higher.
Conclusions Modifiable lifestyles (smoking, physical activity, and BMI) in middle-aged men play an important role in long-term survival free of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. These findings should provide encouragement for public health promotion directed toward middle-aged men.
From the Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine, London, England.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Combined impact of lifestyle factors on mortality: prospective cohort study in US women
Dam et al.
BMJ 2008;337:a1440-a1440.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Lifestyle and cardiovascular disease in middle-aged British men: the effect of adjusting for within-person variation
Emberson et al.
Eur Heart J 2005;26:1774-1782.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The British Regional Heart Study 1975-2004
Walker et al.
Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:1185-1192.
FULL TEXT
Body Mass Index and Total and Cardiovascular Mortality in Men With a History of Cardiovascular Disease
Widlansky et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2326-2332.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Screening and Interventions for Obesity in Adults: Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
McTigue et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:933-949.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Toothbrushing as Part of the Adolescent Lifestyle Predicts Education Level
Koivusilta et al.
JDR 2003;82:361-366.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Short-term exercise training increases ACh-induced relaxation and eNOS protein in porcine pulmonary arteries
Johnson et al.
J. Appl. Physiol. 2001;90:1102-1110.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Leisure-Time Physical Activity, Television Watching, and Plasma Biomarkers of Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease Risk
Fung et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:1171-1178.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Locomotor disability in a cohort of British men: the impact of lifestyle and disease
Ebrahim et al.
Int J Epidemiol 2000;29:478-486.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|