You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 158 No. 4, February 23, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Patient-Physician Relationship, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

What Do Patients Express as Their Preferences in Advance Directives?

Mortimer D. Gross, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:363-365.

Background  Since the passage of the Patient Self-Determination Act in 1991, there has been interest in urging patients to execute advance directives (ADs) for medical care. There are not much data, however, as to what the ADs that patients execute actually specify. I have investigated the percentage of inpatients and outpatients who are admitted to a community hospital who have executed ADs, and I have tabulated what preferences are actually expressed in the ADs that are in hospital records.

Methods  A questionnaire is filled out by each patient admitted to this hospital, and their response recorded as to whether they have executed an AD. I have tabulated these responses for inpatients and outpatients for the calendar year 1994. I have also examined the ADs in all available hospital records, and tabulated the wishes expressed in these directives.

Results  For inpatient admissions during the calendar year 1994, of 8727 questionnaires completed, 11% of patients indicated that they had executed an AD. For outpatients, the corresponding figures are 22966 and 15%. A total of 343 hospital records containing ADs were examined. Of these, 15 were nonmedical directives and were excluded. Of the 328 medical ADs, 86 (26%) were living wills, expressing the wish that if the individual had an incurable disease or irreversible injury that he or she not be given any treatment that would only delay death. There were 210 power of attorney for health care forms completed; these were 64% of all the medical ADs. Of these, 7 did not specify any preference that patients wanted their proxy to follow. The remaining 203 forms were divided as follows: 189 individuals requested that they did not want life-sustaining treatment if the burdens of treatment outweighed the expected benefits; 12 wanted their lives to be prolonged unless they were in an irreversible coma; and 2 wanted their lives to be prolonged to the greatest possible extent regardless of the chances for recovery or the cost. There were 32 do not resuscitate forms executed exclusively by residents of nursing homes that specified that they did not want cardiopulmonary resuscitation or artificial feeding.

Conclusions  The overwhelming desire expressed by the patients in the ADs was not to have their lives prolonged if their medical condition were such that treatment would merely delay death. Only a minuscule number of patients, less than 0.7%, wanted everything done to prolong life regardless of the chance for improvement or the cost. Because such a small percentage of patients have ADs, it is recommended that each hospital appoint a committee on ADs to do everything possible to encourage patients to execute an AD. A second mission of this committee would be to do everything possible to encourage physicians to pay close attention to their patients' wishes for medical care at the end of life.


From the Chicago Medical School/Finch University of Health Sciences, North Chicago, Ill.


RELATED ARTICLE

Ethical Considerations in Executing and Implementing Advance Directives
Erich H. Loewy
Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(4):321-324.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Advance Directives and End-of-Life Decision Making: Survey of Critical Care Nurses' Knowledge, Attitude, and Experience.
Scherer et al.
Crit Care Nurse 2006;26:30-40.
FULL TEXT  

A Voice for the Dying
Meeker and Jezewski
Clin Nurs Res 2004;13:326-342.
ABSTRACT  

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Predictors of Advance Directive Discussions of Registered Nurses
Lipson et al.
West J Nurs Res 2004;26:784-796.
ABSTRACT  

Assessing the Ethical and Practical Wisdom of Surrogate Consent for Living Organ Donation
Wendler and Emanuel
JAMA 2004;291:732-735.
FULL TEXT  

Family Surrogate Decision Making at the End of Life: Seeing them Through with Care and Respect
Meeker
Qual Health Res 2004;14:204-225.
ABSTRACT  

Views of Potential Subjects Toward Proposed Regulations for Clinical Research With Adults Unable to Consent
Wendler et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2002;159:585-591.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of State Advance Directive Documents
Gunter-Hunt et al.
Gerontologist 2002;42:51-60.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcome of Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitations at a Tertiary Referral Center Including Results of "Limited" Resuscitations
Dumot et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:1751-1758.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The value of taking an 'ethics history'
Sayers et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2001;27:114-117.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Elderly Patients' Preferences for Long-term Life Support
Murphy and Santilli
Arch Fam Med 1998;7:484-488.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethical Considerations in Executing and Implementing Advance Directives
Loewy
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:321-324.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.