This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (86)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine  • Patient-Physician Relationship, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Peter A. Singer, MD, MPH, FRCPC; Douglas K. Martin, PhD; James V. Lavery, MSc; Elaine C. Thiel; Merrijoy Kelner, PhD; David C. Mendelssohn, MD, FRCPC

Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:879-884.

Background  Traditional academic assumptions about advance care planning (ACP) include the following: (1) the purpose of ACP is preparing for incapacity; (2) ACP is based on the ethical principle of autonomy and the exercise of control; (3) the focus of ACP is completing written advance directive forms; and (4) ACP occurs within the context of the physician-patient relationship. These assumptions about ACP have never been empirically validated.

Objective  To examine the traditional academic assumptions by exploring ACP from the perspective of patients actively participating in the planning process.

Methods  Forty-eight patients (30 men and 18 women with a mean age of 48.3 years) who were undergoing hemodialysis were interviewed 6 months after receiving an advance directive form. Their experience of ACP was noted in interviews that were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed.

Results  The participants said that their purpose in ACP was to prepare for death and dying, and their underlying goals included the exercise of control and an attempt to relieve burdens placed on loved ones. Advance care planning was viewed as a social process, and completing a written advance directive form was often regarded as unnecessary. Participants often involved close loved ones, but physicians infrequently.

Conclusions  The traditional academic assumptions are not fully supported from the perspective of patients involved in ACP. The patients we interviewed stated that (1) the purpose of ACP is not only preparing for incapacity but also preparing for death; (2) ACP is not based solely on autonomy and the exercise of control, but also on personal relationships and relieving burdens placed on others; (3) the focus of ACP is not only on completing written advance directive forms but also on the social process; and (4) ACP does not occur solely within the context of the physician-patient relationship but also within relationships with close loved ones.

From the University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics (Drs Singer, Martin, and Kelner and Mr Lavery); the Department of Medicine, University of Toronto and the Toronto Hospital (Drs Singer and Mendelssohn); and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Ms Thiel), Toronto, Ontario.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Preferences for dialysis withdrawal and engagement in advance care planning within a diverse sample of dialysis patients
Kurella Tamura et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009;0:gfp430v2-gfp430.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Review Article: Goals of Care Toward the End of Life: A Structured Literature Review
Kaldjian et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2009;25:501-511.
ABSTRACT  

Role of advance directives in palliative care units: a prospective study
Pautex et al.
Palliat Med 2008;22:835-841.
ABSTRACT  

Surrogate Decision Making: Reconciling Ethical Theory and Clinical Practice
Berger et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:48-53.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcomes After Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies in Patients With or Without Advance Care Planning
Ganti et al.
JCO 2007;25:5643-5648.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Feeling like a burden to others: a systematic review focusing on the end of life
McPherson et al.
Palliat Med 2007;21:115-128.
ABSTRACT  

Three Methods of Assessing Values for Advance Care Planning: Comparing Persons With and Without Dementia
Karel et al.
J Aging Health 2007;19:123-151.
ABSTRACT  

The State of Advance Care Planning: One Decade After SUPPORT
Collins et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2006;23:378-384.
ABSTRACT  

Deferred Decision Making: patients' reliance on family and physicians for cpr decisions in critical care
Kim and Kjervik
Nurs Ethics 2005;12:493-506.
ABSTRACT  

Medical Advance Care Planning for Persons With Serious Mental Illness
Foti et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2005;56:576-584.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Resuscitating Advance Directives
Lo and Steinbrook
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1501-1506.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring preparedness to address patient preferences at the end of life
Kane et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2004;21:267-274.
ABSTRACT  

Communicating End-of-Life Preferences
McDonald et al.
West J Nurs Res 2003;25:652-666.
ABSTRACT  

Response by McDonald
West J Nurs Res 2003;25:673-675.
 

Meaning and Agency in Discussing End-of-Life Care: A Study of Elderly Veterans' Values and Interpretations
Young et al.
Qual Health Res 2003;13:1039-1062.
ABSTRACT  

Using clinical empowerment to teach ethics and conflict management in antemortem care: A case study
Jackson et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2003;20:274-278.
 

Advance Directives and Patient-Physician Communication
Hahn
JAMA 2003;289:96-96.
FULL TEXT  

Improving Communication Near the End of Life
HICKMAN
American Behavioral Scientist 2002;46:252-267.
ABSTRACT  

The Wendland Case -- Withdrawing Life Support from Incompetent Patients Who Are Not Terminally Ill
Lo et al.
NEJM 2002;346:1489-1493.
FULL TEXT  

Advance Directives and Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Hamel et al.
West J Nurs Res 2002;24:143-158.
ABSTRACT  

Discussing Religious and Spiritual Issues at the End of Life: A Practical Guide for Physicians
Lo et al.
JAMA 2002;287:749-754.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Communicating With Dying Patients Within the Spectrum of Medical Care From Terminal Diagnosis to Death
Wenrich et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:868-874.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

End-of-Life Care Preferences of Patients Enrolled in Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Programs
Heffner and Barbieri
Chest 2000;117:1474-1481.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Responding to Legal Requests for Physician-Assisted Suicide
Tulsky et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2000;132:494-499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Other Articles Noted
Evid. Based Nurs. 1999;2:105-112.
FULL TEXT  

Dialysis Patients' Preferences for Family-Based Advance Care Planning
Hines et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1999;130:825-828.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality End-of-Life Care: Patients' Perspectives
Singer et al.
JAMA 1999;281:163-168.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A New Model of Advance Care Planning: Observations From People With HIV
Martin et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:86-92.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT