You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 11, June 14, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (27)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

The Long-term Prognostic Significance of Repeated Blood Pressure Measurements in the Elderly

SPAA (Studio sulla Pressione Arteriosa nell'Anziano) 10-Year Follow-up

Claudio Alli, MD; Fausto Avanzini, MD; Giuseppe Bettelli, MD; Fabio Colombo, PhD; Valter Torri, MD; Gianni Tognoni, MD; and general practitioners of SPAA

Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1205-1212.

Background  In young and middle-aged people, both systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure have a continuous, strong, and independent relationship with subsequent cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. These relationships are not well documented in older people and, until now, studies in the elderly do not provide homogeneous results on the importance of DBP compared with SBP as a cardiovascular risk factor.

Objective  To determine whether SBP and DBP are independent indicators of mortality risk in the elderly.

Design  An observational prospective cohort study to analyze the long-term prognostic significance of repeated SBP and DBP measurements in the elderly.

Patients and Methods  A total of 3858 outpatients 65 years or older (mean age [SD], 72.9 [4.9] years, 43.5% men) were selected randomly by 444 Italian National Health Service general practitioners in 1983. The population was followed up for 10 years. Crude and adjusted incidence rates of total and cardiovascular mortality were analyzed for classes of SBP and DBP based on the values recorded at the 2 initial visits 1 week apart and those measured during the first 12 months of follow-up.

Results  During the 10-year follow-up, 74 patients (1.9%) were lost to follow-up and 1561 (41.3%) died, 709 (45.4% of all deaths) from cardiovascular causes. A positive continuous, graded, strong, and independent association was observed with both total (P<.001) and cardiovascular (P<.001) mortality for SBP but not for DBP. The pattern was similar in both sexes, in persons younger and older than 75 years, regardless of preexisting cardiovascular diseases, and whether they had been receiving antihypertensive treatment at baseline. There was no J-shaped mortality curve in the subjects with the lowest SBP and DBP.

Conclusions  These findings suggest that SBP, but not DBP, is a strong, positive, continuous, independent indicator of mortality risk in the elderly and should be stressed much more than DBP in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in this age group.


From the Ospedale Niguarda (Dr Alli) and the Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri" (Drs Alli, Avanzini, Bettelli, Colombo, Torri, and Tognoni), Milan, Italy. A complete listing of the 444 general practitioners of the Italian National Health Service who participated in SPAA was published previously (Practitioner [edizione Italiana]. 1984;75:74-83).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Which Blood Pressure Measurement Is More Important in the Elderly?
William J. Elliott
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(11):1165-1166.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(11):1259-1260.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Quantifying Risk of Adverse Clinical Events With One Set of Vital Signs Among Primary Care Patients with Hypertension
Tierney et al.
Ann Fam Med 2004;2:209-217.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Stiffness and Risk of Atherosclerotic Events
Oliver and Webb
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 2003;23:554-566.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

J-Shaped Relationship between Blood Pressure and Mortality in Hypertensive Patients: New Insights from a Meta-Analysis of Individual-Patient Data
Boutitie et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;136:438-448.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Changing Face of Hypertension: Is Systolic Blood Pressure the Final Answer?
Deedwania
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:506-508.
FULL TEXT  

One-Year Study of Felodipine or Placebo for Stage 1 Isolated Systolic Hypertension
Black et al.
Hypertension 2001;38:1118-1123.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association Between Blood Pressure Level and the Risk of Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, and Total Mortality: The Cardiovascular Health Study
Psaty et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:1183-1192.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Baseline Characteristics and Early Blood Pressure Control in the CONVINCE Trial
Black et al.
Hypertension 2001;37:12-18.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognosis of Isolated Systolic and Isolated Diastolic Hypertension as Assessed by Self-Measurement of Blood Pressure at Home: The Ohasama Study
Hozawa et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:3301-3306.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Paradigm Has Shifted, to Systolic Blood Pressure
Black
Hypertension 1999;34:386-387.
FULL TEXT  

Which Blood Pressure Measurement Is More Important in the Elderly?
Elliott
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1165-1166.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.