 |
|
Normal D-Dimer Levels in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism
Ilana Kutinsky, DO;
Susan Blakley, MD;
Vivyenne Roche, ML, MB
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1569-1572.
Background Pulmonary embolism (PE) is frequently evaluated in acute care settings. Despite this, the clinical diagnosis of PE is difficult. Results of ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scans may be inconclusive, and pulmonary angiograms (PAGs) are cumbersome, involve risk, and are often unavailable. Using PAG as the standard criterion, we evaluated the relationship between PE, V/Q scans, and semiquantitative latex agglutination (LA) D-dimer levels.
Methods Ninety-eight patients who underwent V/Q scanning for suspected PE were enrolled; based on the results of the scans, the patients were scheduled for PAG. Blood samples were drawn for LA D-dimer assays during the PAGs at Saint Joseph Hospital, Denver, Colo, from January 1, 1996, to February 1, 1997. A detailed medical record review was performed for all enrollees.
Results The mean ± SEM patient age was 56.6 ± 1.9 years; 52 (53%) were men, 13 (13%) had cancer, 23 (23%) had undergone surgery within 30 days of their PAG, and 13 (13%) were receiving warfarin sodium. There were no differences in warfarin therapy, hypercoaguable state, or cancer prevalence between patients with negative and positive PAGs (P=.53). Ventilation-perfusion scan results were available for all study patients. Eight (27%) of 30 patients who had positive angiogram results had LA D-dimer levels less than 250 ng/mL. Patients with positive PAGs (n=30) had the following V/Q scan results: normal, 0; low probability, 7; intermediate or indeterminate probability, 22; and high probability, 1. In patients with low-probability V/Q scan results (n=34), a positive D-dimer result for PE (>250 ng/mL) had a sensitivity of 71.4% (95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.97) and a negative predictive value of 87.5% (95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.98). We found a significant difference in D-dimer levels in patients with an abnormal angiogram result (mean, 750 ng/mL) compared with patients with a normal angiogram result (mean, 250 ng/mL) (P=.01,  2 test).
Conclusions Eight patients had normal D-dimer levels with angiographic evidence of PE. Algorithms in acute care settings have been proposed; they exclude PE with normal D-dimer levels using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique. These cannot be extrapolated to the more widely used LA assays. A normal LA D-dimer level alone or with V/Q scan results is not recommended to preclude the treatment of PE.
From the Departments of Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Hospital (Drs Kutinsky and Blakley); and Center on Aging, Division of Geriatrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center (Dr Roche), Denver, Colo. Dr Roche is now with the University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED LETTER
D-Dimer and Pulmonary Embolism: Is There a Good Interpretation?
Esteban Pérez-Rodriguez, David Jimenez, Gema Diaz, and Julio Flores
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(14):2217-2218.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(14):1630-1631.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism
Roy et al.
BMJ 2005;331:259.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
D-Dimer for the Exclusion of Acute Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review
Stein et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:589-602.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Sensitivity and Specificity of the Semiquantitative Latex Agglutination D-Dimer Assay for the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism as Defined by Computed Tomographic Angiography
Froehling et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:164-168.
ABSTRACT
Rational Use of D-Dimer Measurement to Exclude Acute Venous Thromboembolic Disease
Frost et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:1385-1391.
ABSTRACT
Role of fibrin D-dimer testing in emergency medicine
Wakai et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2003;20:319-325.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Diagnostic Accuracy of a Bedside D-dimer Assay and Alveolar Dead-Space Measurement for Rapid Exclusion of Pulmonary Embolism: A Multicenter Study
Kline et al.
JAMA 2001;285:761-768.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
D-Dimer and Pulmonary Embolism: Is There a Good Interpretation?
Perez-Rodriguez et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2217-2218.
FULL TEXT
Latex Agglutination Is a Valid Method for the Measurement of D-Dimer Levels
Fiedler
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:2485-2485.
FULL TEXT
A Normal D-dimer Does Not Rule Out PE
JWatch Emergency Med. 1999;1999:20-20.
FULL TEXT
|
