You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 15, August 9, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (43)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Articles on Complementary Medicine in the Mainstream Medical Literature

An Investigation of MEDLINE, 1966 Through 1996

Joanne Barnes, BPharm, MRPharmS; Neil C. Abbot, MSc, PhD; Elaine F. Harkness, BSc(Hons); Edzard Ernst, MD, PhD, FRCP(Edin)

Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1721-1725.

Objective  To investigate the growth of interest, if any, in complementary or alternative medicine by the professional scientific community from the number of MEDLINE-listed and clinical trial–type articles for January 1, 1966, through December 31, 1996.

Methods  Systematic literature searches of the MEDLINE database, using the expanded terms "alternative medicine," "traditional medicine," "acupuncture," "homeopathy," and "chiropractic," were conducted in January 1998 to evaluate the number of all articles. The number of clinical trial–type articles on the above was obtained by conducting searches for those indexed as 1 or more of the following publication types: clinical trial; clinical trial phase 1, 2, 3, or 4; controlled clinical trial; meta-analysis; randomized controlled trial; and limited to "human" trials only.

Results  Articles indexed as alternative medicine formed a small proportion (0.4%) of the total number of MEDLINE-listed articles throughout the period studied. From 1966 through 1996, the total number of articles listed in MEDLINE rose significantly to a peak of 400,000 additions per annum in 1996 (r=0.97; P<.001). By contrast, the number of articles indexed under alternative medicine rose progressively only from 1972 through 1986 and since then has been relatively stable at around 1500 additions per annum. For this period, the proportion of clinical trial–type alternative medicine articles was low (mean, 2.1% per annum) but increased significantly from 1987 through 1996, reaching around 10% of the total in 1996 (r=0.79; P<.001). Patterns of growth in the number of publications for individual therapies have varied during the period studied, and clinical trial–type articles form only a small part of any increase.

Conclusions  Interest in and awareness of complementary medicine among orthodox health care professionals has increased in the past 30 years. The increase in the number and proportion of reports of clinical trials indicates an increasing level of original research activity in complementary medicine and suggests a trend toward an evidence-based approach in this discipline. The cumulative number of clinical trial–type articles is small, however, and more high-quality original research in complementary medicine is required.


From the Department of Complementary Medicine, Division of Community Health Science, School of Postgraduate Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, England.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(15):1818-1819.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Trends in attention to complementary and alternative medicine in the American medical literature
Winnick
Health (London) 2007;11:371-399.
ABSTRACT  

The History of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the US
Rosenbaum
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2007;41:1256-1260.
FULL TEXT  

Moving Toward Integrative Care: Rationales, Models, and Steps for Conventional-Care Providers
Mann et al.
Complementary Health Practice Review 2004;9:155-172.
ABSTRACT  

The Persistence and Resurgence of Medical Pluralism
Goldstein
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2004;29:925-946.
 

Patient Attitudes, Insurance, and Other Determinants of Self-Referral to Medical and Chiropractic Physicians
Sharma et al.
Am. J. Public Health 2003;93:2111-2117.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Variations in Product Choices of Frequently Purchased Herbs: Caveat Emptor
Garrard et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2290-2295.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Public Health Agenda for Traditional, Complementary, and Alternative Medicine
Bodeker and Kronenberg
Am. J. Public Health 2002;92:1582-1591.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Emerging Socioeconomic and Political Support for Alternative Medicine in the United States
GOLDSTEIN
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2002;583:44-63.
ABSTRACT  

Integrative Medicine: Integrating Conventional and Alternative Medicine; The Journal of Integrative Medicine
McKee and Zenan
JAMA 2000;283:2993-2994.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.