You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 17, September 27, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (41)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Thrombolysis
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Recurrent Venous Thrombosis and Heparin Therapy

An Evaluation of the Importance of Early Activated Partial Thromboplastin Times

Sonia S. Anand, MD, MSc; Shannon Bates, MD, CM; Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, MD; Mark Levine, MD; Harry Buller, MD; Martin Prins, MD; Susan Haley, BSc; Clive Kearon, MB; Jack Hirsh, MD; Michael Gent, DSc

Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2029-2032.

Background  The presence of an association between early subtherapeutic activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) and recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains controversial.

Objective  To determine the relation between early subtherapeutic aPTTs and recurrent VTE in patients who were treated with intravenous (IV) unfractionated heparin (UFH).

Patients and Methods  We studied 961 patients with acute VTE who received IV UFH in 3 randomized trials that compared the use of IV UFH (loading dose: 5000 U IV; initial infusion, 1250-1280 U/h) with that of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin. According to aPTT criteria, patients were classified as being in a subtherapeutic or a therapeutic state during the first 24 and 48 hours of treatment. All episodes of possible recurrent VTE were adjudicated by an independent committee that was unaware of the aPTTs.

Results  At 24 hours, in 886 patients who were eligible for the analysis, the rate of recurrent VTE in the subtherapeutic group was 6.7% (11/163) compared with 5.3% (38/723) in the therapeutic group. The odds ratio for recurrence in patients in the subtherapeutic vs the therapeutic group at 24 hours was 1.30 (95% confidence interval: 0.64-2.63; P=.46). At 48 hours, in 917 patients who were eligible for the analysis, the rate of recurrent VTE in the subtherapeutic group was 7.8% (5/64) compared with 5.7% (49/853) in the therapeutic group. The odds ratio for recurrence in patients in the subtherapeutic vs the therapeutic group at 48 hours was 1.32 (95% confidence interval: 0.51-3.44; P=.56).

Conclusion  In patients with acute VTE who receive an IV bolus of 5000 U, followed by a starting dose of at least 1250 U/h of UFH, a subtherapeutic aPTT response during the first 48 hours of treatment is not associated with a large increase in the risk of recurrent VTE.


From the Departments of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario (Drs Anand, Bates, Ginsberg, Levine, Kearon, Hirsh, and Gent and Ms Haley), and the Center for Hemostasis, Thrombosis, Atherosclerosis, and Inflammation Research, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Drs Buller and Prins).


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(17):2094-2095.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic Disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Kearon et al.
Chest 2008;133:454S-545S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of fixed-dose weight-adjusted unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin for acute treatment of venous thromboembolism.
Kearon et al.
JAMA 2006;296:935-942.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin vs low-molecular-weight heparin for acute thromboembolic disease: issues of efficacy and cost.
Carson
JAMA 2006;296:991-993.
FULL TEXT  

Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic Disease: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Buller et al.
Chest 2004;126:401S-428S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Initial Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism
McRae and Ginsberg
Circulation 2004;110:I-3-I-9.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Subcutaneous Adjusted-Dose Unfractionated Heparin vs Fixed-Dose Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in the Initial Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism
Writing Committee for the Galilei Investigators
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1077-1083.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Subcutaneous Fondaparinux versus Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin in the Initial Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism
The Matisse Investigators
NEJM 2003;349:1695-1702.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management of Venous Thromboembolism: Past, Present, and Future
Hyers
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:759-768.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guide to Anticoagulant Therapy: Heparin : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association
Hirsh et al.
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 2001;21 :e9-e9.
FULL TEXT  

Guide to Anticoagulant Therapy: Heparin : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association
Hirsh et al.
Circulation 2001;103:2994-3018.
FULL TEXT  

Heparin and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Mechanisms of Action, Pharmacokinetics, Dosing, Monitoring, Efficacy, and Safety
Hirsh et al.
Chest 2001;119:64S-94S.
FULL TEXT  

Antithrombotic Therapy for Venous Thromboembolic Disease
Hyers et al.
Chest 2001;119:176S-193S.
FULL TEXT  

Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism
Eur Heart J 2000;21:1301-1336.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.