You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 17, September 27, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (87)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Tobacco
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Randomized Comparative Trial of Nicotine Polacrilex, a Transdermal Patch, Nasal Spray, and an Inhaler

Peter Hajek, PhD; Robert West, PhD; Jonathan Foulds, PhD; Fredrik Nilsson, MSc; Sylvia Burrows, BSc; Anna Meadow, BSc

Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2033-2038.

Background  There are several nicotine replacement products on the market, and physicians are likely to be asked with increasing frequency about which of these products their patients should use.

Objective  To provide a basis for rational advice by comparing nicotine polacrilex (gum), a transdermal patch, nasal spray, and an inhaler.

Design  Randomized trial with assessments at the quit date and 1, 4, and 12 weeks later.

Setting  Hospital smokers' clinic.

Patients  Male and female community volunteers (N=504) smoking 10 or more cigarettes per day and seeking help to stop smoking.

Interventions  Patients were given brief advice, and purchased their nicotine replacement treatment at approximately half the regular retail price.

Main Outcome Measures  Nicotine replacement treatment use, ratings of withdrawal symptoms, ratings of product characteristics and helpfulness, and biochemically validated continuous lapse-free abstinence.

Results  The products did not differ in their effects on withdrawal discomfort, urges to smoke, or rates of abstinence. The continuous validated 12-week abstinence rates were 20%, 21%, 24%, and 24% in the gum, patch, spray, and inhaler groups, respectively. Compliance with recommended nicotine replacement treatment use was high for the patch, low for gum, and very low for the spray and the inhaler. The spray was underused because of adverse effects more often than the other products. In the subjects using the spray, the level of use among abstainers at week 1 predicted outcome at week 12. The inhaler was rated as more embarrassing to use than the other products, but provided at least as much nicotine as the gum.

Conclusion  When asked about nicotine replacement treatment products available, physicians should note that, despite low compliance with the recommended dose of the spray and inhaler and differences in product ratings, overall, there are no notable differences between the products in their effects on withdrawal discomfort, perceived helpfulness, or general efficacy.


From the Department of Human Science, St Bartholomew's and the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry (Dr Hajek and Ms Meadow) and Department of Psychology, St George's Hospital Medical School (Drs West and Foulds and Ms Burrows), University of London, London, England; Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guilford, England (Dr Foulds); and Pharmacia & Upjohn, Helsingborg, Sweden (Mr Nilsson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(17):2094-2095.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

What do we know about the role of pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation before or during pregnancy?
Oncken and Kranzler
Nicotine Tob Res 2009;11:1265-1273.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Authors' reply
Aubin et al.
Thorax 2008;63:752-753.
FULL TEXT  

Nicotine Replacement Therapy for Tobacco Use Cessation: Reference Table
Chu
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2006;19:297-300.
ABSTRACT  

New Weapon to Curb Smoking: No More Excuses to Delay Treatment.
Johnson
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1547-1550.
FULL TEXT  

"Tobacco Free With FDNY": The New York City Fire Department World Trade Center Tobacco Cessation Study.
Bars et al.
Chest 2006;129:979-987.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Application Sites and Multiple Doses on Nicotine Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Male Japanese Smokers Following Application of the Transdermal Nicotine Patch
Sobue et al.
J Clin Pharmacol 2005;45:1391-1399.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pharmacotherapy for Nicotine Dependence
Henningfield et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:281-299.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of UK policy initiatives on use of medicines to aid smoking cessation
West et al.
Tobacco Control 2005;14:166-171.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treating Tobacco Dependence: State of the Science and New Directions
Lerman et al.
JCO 2005;23:311-323.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Case Series of Nicotine Nasal Spray in the Treatment of Tobacco Dependence Among Patients With Schizophrenia
Williams et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2004;55:1064-1066.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Individualizing Nicotine Replacement Therapy for the Treatment of Tobacco Dependence: A Randomized Trial
Lerman et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:426-433.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Putting the research into practice
Rigotti
BMJ 2003;327:1395-1396.
FULL TEXT  

Nicotine replacement therapy in smoking cessation
Campbell
Thorax 2003;58:464-465.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical trial comparing nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) plus brief counselling, brief counselling alone, and minimal intervention on smoking cessation in hospital inpatients
Molyneux et al.
Thorax 2003;58:484-488.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease * 8: Non-pharmacological management of COPD
Morgan and Britton
Thorax 2003;58:453-457.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence
Rigotti
NEJM 2002;346:506-512.
FULL TEXT  

Smoking cessation guidelines for health professionals: an update
West et al.
Thorax 2000;55:987-999.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 36-Year-Old Woman Who Smokes Cigarettes
Rigotti
JAMA 2000;284:741-749.
FULL TEXT  

Continued Dependence on Nicotine Replacement Therapy Should Be Reported and Discussed in Smoking Cessation Trials
Gylys et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2062-2063.
FULL TEXT  

Pharmacotherapy of Smoking Cessation
Okuyemi et al.
Arch Fam Med 2000;9:270-281.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.