You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 19, October 25, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (50)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

A Prospective, Randomized Trial to Assess the Cost Impact of Pharmacist-Initiated Interventions

S. Troy McMullin, PharmD; Joel A. Hennenfent, PharmD; David J. Ritchie, PharmD; Way Y. Huey, PharmD; Thomas P. Lonergan, PharmD; Robyn A. Schaiff, PharmD; Michael E. Tonn, PharmD; Thomas C. Bailey, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2306-2309.

Background  Hospital pharmacists make many recommendations that improve patients' quality of care and/or reduce drug costs. While the impact of quality-of-care interventions is difficult to quantify, those limited to cost savings could be assessed in a prospective, randomized fashion.

Objective  To assess the impact of pharmacist-initiated interventions on cost savings.

Methods  Six pharmacists at a large university hospital recorded patient-specific recommendations for 30 days. All quality-of-care interventions were completed by the pharmacists, but those strictly aimed at reducing costs were stratified by drug class and randomized to an intervention or control group. Pharmacists contacted physicians with cost-saving recommendations in the intervention group, while control group patients were simply observed.

Main Outcome Measure  Drug costs after randomization.

Results  Most (n=967 [79%]) of the 1226 interventions recorded were aimed at improving quality of care. The remaining 259 (21%) provided equivalent quality of care, but at less expense. These cost-saving interventions typically involved streamlining therapy to less expensive agents (39%), discontinuing an unnecessary medication (25%), or modifying the route of administration (24%). The group randomized to receive a pharmacist's intervention had drug costs that were 41% lower than those in the control group (mean, $73.75 vs $43.40; P<.001). Interventions involving anti-infective agents had the greatest cost savings (mean, $104.08 vs $58.45; P<.001). For our institution, this extrapolates to an annual savings of approximately $394,000 (95% confidence interval, $46,000-$742,000). As expected, these interventions had no impact on length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmissions, or the need to readminister the targeted medication or restart intravenous therapy.

Conclusions  While interventions solely aimed at reducing costs represent a small portion of a pharmacist's activities, they can result in significant savings for an institution.


From the Department of Pharmacy, Barnes-Jewish Hospital (Drs McMullin, Hennenfent, Ritchie, Huey, Lonergan, Schaiff, and Tonn), the Division of Pharmacy Practice, Saint Louis College of Pharmacy (Dr Ritchie), and the Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine (Dr Bailey), St Louis, Mo.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(19):2369-2370.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Economic effects of clinical pharmacy interventions: A literature review
De Rijdt et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008;65:1161-1172.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical pharmacist's daily role in the emergency department of a community hospital
Wymore et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008;65:395-399.
FULL TEXT  

Effect of pharmacists on medication errors in an emergency department
Brown et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008;65:330-333.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of pharmacy validation in a computerized physician order entry context
Estellat et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:317-325.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of personal digital assistants for documentation of pharmacists' interventions: A literature review
Fox et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:1516-1525.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of a Pharmacy Resident on Hospital Length of Stay and Drug-Related Costs
Terceros et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2007;41:742-748.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Provision of pain management by a pharmacist with prescribing authority
Dole et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:85-89.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reimbursement for clinical services provided by pharmacists: What are we doing wrong?
Dole and Murawski
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2007;64:104-106.
FULL TEXT  

Clinical pharmacists and inpatient medical care: a systematic review.
Kaboli et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:955-964.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Documentation of pharmacist interventions in the emergency department
Ling et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005;62:1793-1797.
FULL TEXT  

Impact of an interdisciplinary team on drug therapy outcomes in a geriatric clinic
Lam and Ruby
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005;62:626-629.
FULL TEXT  

A randomized controlled trial of a pharmacist consultation program for family physicians and their elderly patients
Sellors et al.
CMAJ 2003;169:17-22.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pharmacist Scope of Practice
American College of Physicians-American Society of
ANN INTERN MED 2002;136:79-85.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.