This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (20)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine  • Adult Critical Care  • Alert me on articles by topic

Carl van Walraven, MD, FRCPC, MSc; Alan J. Forster, MD, FRCPC; Ian G. Stiell, MD, MSc, FRCPC

Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:129-134.

Background  Most patients undergoing in-hospital cardiac resuscitation will not survive to hospital discharge.

Objective  To derive a decision rule permitting the discontinuation of futile resuscitation attempts by identifying patients with no chance of surviving to hospital discharge.

Patients and Methods  Patient, arrest, and outcome data for 1077 adult patients undergoing in-hospital cardiac resuscitation was retrieved from 2 randomized clinical trials involving 5 teaching hospitals at 2 university centers. Recursive partitioning was used to identify a decision rule using variables significantly associated with death in hospital.

Results  One hundred three patients (9.6%) survived to hospital discharge. Death in hospital was significantly more likely if patients were older than 75 years (P<.001), the arrest was unwitnessed (P = .003), the resuscitation lasted longer than 10 minutes (P<.001), and the initial cardiac rhythm was not ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (P<.001). All patients died if there was no pulse 10 minutes after the start of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the initial cardiac rhythm was not ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, and the arrest was not witnessed. As a resuscitation rule, these parameters identified all patients who survived to hospital discharge (sensitivity, 100%; 95% confidence interval, 97.1%-100%). Resuscitation could have been discontinued for 119 (12.1%) of 974 patients who did not survive, thereby avoiding 47 days of postresuscitative care.

Conclusions  A practical and highly sensitive decision rule has been derived that identifies patients with no chance of surviving in-hospital cardiac arrest. Prospective validation of the rule is necessary before it can be used clinically.

From the Department of Medicine (Drs van Walraven and Forster) and the Division of Emergency Medicine (Dr Stiell), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario.

RELATED ARTICLE

Do We Need a Clinical Decision Rule for the Discontinuation of Cardiac Arrest Resuscitations?
Arthur B. Sanders
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(2):119-121.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Development and Application of Clinical Prediction Rules to Improve Decision Making in Physical Therapist Practice
Childs and Cleland
ptjournal 2006;86:122-131.
FULL TEXT  

CPR for Patients Labeled DNR: The Role of the Limited Aggressive Therapy Order
Choudhry et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:65-68.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiac Resuscitation
Eisenberg and Mengert
NEJM 2001;344:1304-1313.
FULL TEXT  

Validation of a Clinical Decision Aid to Discontinue In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitations
van Walraven et al.
JAMA 2001;285:1602-1606.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Apolipoprotein E Polymorphism : Survival and Neurological Outcome After Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Schiefermeier et al.
Stroke 2000;31:2068-2073.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decision Rule for Discontinuing In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation
JWatch Emergency Med. 1999;1999:15-15.
FULL TEXT  

Do We Need a Clinical Decision Rule for the Discontinuation of Cardiac Arrest Resuscitations?
Sanders
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:119-121.
FULL TEXT