You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 22, December 13, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (43)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Evaluating Hypertension Control in a Managed Care Setting

Mark Alexander, PhD; Irene Tekawa, MA; Enid Hunkeler, MA; Bruce Fireman, MA; Richard Rowell, MPH; Joe V. Selby, MD, MPH; Barry M. Massie, MD; Warren Cooper, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2673-2677.

Background  We conducted a retrospective cohort study on a random sample of adult patients with hypertension in a large health maintenance organization to assess the feasibility of documenting blood pressure (BP) control and to compare different measures for defining BP control.

Methods  Three criteria for BP control were assessed: systolic BP less than 140 mm Hg; diastolic BP less than 90 mm Hg; and combined BP control, with systolic BP less than 140 mm Hg and diastolic BP less than 90 mm Hg. Four methods of assessing hypertension control by the above criteria were examined: proportion of patients with BP under control at 75% and 50% or more of their office visits; the mean of all pressures during the study period; and the BP from the last visit during the study period.

Results  The proportion of patients meeting each criterion for control was similar whether we used the mean BP for all visits, the last recorded BP, or control at 50% or more of visits. Control rates were substantially lower when the more stringent assessment, 75% of visits, was used. The proportion of patients with combined BP control at 75% or more of their visits was half that of the other methods.

Conclusions  In this health maintenance organization population, results with the use of the simplest approach, the last BP measurement recorded, were similar to results with the mean BP. Our findings indicate that evaluation of BP control in a large health maintenance organization will find substantial room for improvement, and clinicians should be encouraged to be more aggressive in their management of hypertension, especially with regard to the systolic BP, which until recent years has been underemphasized.


From the Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Northern California Region, Oakland (Drs Alexander and Selby, Mss Tekawa and Hunkeler, and Messrs Fireman and Rowell); the Medical Effectiveness Research Center, the Center for Aging in Diverse Communities, the Division of General Internal Medicine (Dr Alexander), the Department of Medicine (Drs Alexander and Massie), University of California, and the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Dr Massie), San Francisco; and Astra Pharmaceuticals LP, Wayne, Pa (Dr Cooper).


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(22):2751.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

An Intervention to Overcome Clinical Inertia and Improve Diabetes Mellitus Control in a Primary Care Setting: Improving Primary Care of African Americans With Diabetes (IPCAAD) 8.
Ziemer et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:507-513.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Statin and beta-blocker therapy and the initial presentation of coronary heart disease.
Go et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;144:229-238.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Epidemiology of Uncontrolled Hypertension in the United States
Wang and Vasan
Circulation 2005;112:1651-1662.
FULL TEXT  

Chronic Kidney Disease and the Risks of Death, Cardiovascular Events, and Hospitalization
Go et al.
NEJM 2004;351:1296-1305.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for Hypertension: Are Quality-Assurance Measures on Target?
Singer et al.
Hypertension 2004;43:198-202.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hypertension Management in Patients With Diabetes: The need for more aggressive therapy
Berlowitz et al.
Diabetes Care 2003;26:355-359.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Goal-Oriented Hypertension Management: Translating Clinical Trials to Practice
Singer et al.
Hypertension 2002;40:464-469.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Factors Associated With Hypertension Control in the General Population of the United States
He et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1051-1058.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Changing Face of Hypertension: Is Systolic Blood Pressure the Final Answer?
Deedwania
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:506-508.
FULL TEXT  

Physician-Related Barriers to the Effective Management of Uncontrolled Hypertension
Oliveria et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:413-420.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Characteristics of Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension in the United States
Hyman and Pavlik
NEJM 2001;345:479-486.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Baseline Characteristics and Early Blood Pressure Control in the CONVINCE Trial
Black et al.
Hypertension 2001;37:12-18.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differential Control of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure : Factors Associated With Lack of Blood Pressure Control in the Community
Lloyd-Jones et al.
Hypertension 2000;36:594-599.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improvement of Outcomes in Chronic Illness
Katon
Arch Fam Med 2000;9:709-711.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.