 |
|
Cranial Computed Tomography Before Lumbar Puncture
A Prospective Clinical Evaluation
Ajay K. Gopal, MD;
James D. Whitehouse, MD;
David L. Simel, MD, MHS;
G. Ralph Corey, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2681-2685.
Objective To prospectively identify which patients can safely undergo lumbar puncture (LP) without screening cranial computed tomography (CT).
Methods Emergency department physicians examined patients before CT. Examiners recorded the presence or absence of 10 clinical findings and answered 8 additional questions. The criterion standard was noncontrast cranial CT interpreted by staff radiologists. Clinical findings were prospectively compared with those of CT.
Results One hundred thirteen consecutive adults with the urgent need for LP (median age, 42 years) were studied. Fifteen percent of patients meeting entrance criteria had new CT-documented lesions, with 2.7% having lesions that contraindicated LP. Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LRs) were measured for the clinical findings. Three statistically significant predictors of new intracranial lesions were identified: altered mentation (positive LR, 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-3.2), focal neurologic examination (positive LR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.9-10), and papilledema (positive LR, 11.1; 95% CI, 1.1-115). No single item adequately predicted the absence of CT abnormalities, but the clinical screening items in aggregate significantly predicted the results (negative LR, 0; upper 95% confidence limit, 0.6). The overall clinical impression had the highest predictive value in identifying patients with CT-defined contraindications to LP (positive LR, 18.8; 95% CI, 4.8-43).
Conclusions Because of the low prevalence of lesions that contraindicate LP, screening cranial CT solely to establish the safety of performing an LP typically provides limited additional information. Physicians can use their overall clinical impression and 3 clinical predictors to identify patients with the greatest risk of having intracranial lesions that may contraindicate LP.
From the Department of Medicine, Duke University (Drs Gopal, Whitehouse, Simel, and Corey), and the Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Dr Simel), Durham, NC. Dr Gopal is now with the Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(22):2751.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Lumbar Puncture and Brain Herniation in Acute Bacterial Meningitis: A Review
Joffe
J Intensive Care Med 2007;22:194-207.
ABSTRACT
How do I perform a lumbar puncture and analyze the results to diagnose bacterial meningitis?
Straus et al.
JAMA 2006;296:2012-2022.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Role of computed tomography before lumbar puncture: a survey of clinical practice.
Greig and Goroszeniuk
Postgrad. Med. J. 2006;82:162-165.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Delays in the administration of antibiotics are associated with mortality from adult acute bacterial meningitis
Proulx et al.
QJM 2005;98:291-298.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Fatal Lumbar Puncture: Fact Versus Fiction--An Approach to a Clinical Dilemma
Oliver et al.
Pediatrics 2003;112:e174-176.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Computed Tomography of the Head before Lumbar Puncture in Adults with Suspected Meningitis
Hasbun et al.
NEJM 2001;345:1727-1733.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cranial Computed Tomography Before Lumbar Puncture
Linden et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2868-2870.
FULL TEXT
Clinical Findings May Predict Negative CT in Emergency Lumbar Puncture
JWatch General 1999;1999:1-1.
FULL TEXT
|
