You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 22, December 13, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Observation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (27)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Nursing Care
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Chronic Disease Management

Treating the Patient With Disease(s) vs Treating Disease(s) in the Patient

Robert F. DeBusk, MD; Jeffrey A. West, MD; Nancy Houston Miller, RN, BSN; C. Barr Taylor, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2739-2742.

The treatment of chronic disease is often complicated by the coexistence of multiple medical conditions and by the presence of social and psychological impediments. The needs posed by patients with chronic disease are overwhelming the capacity of the American health care system. Alternative disease management systems that rely on specially trained nurse case managers to implement detailed clinical protocols, including drug algorithms, have shown efficacy in managing chronic medical conditions, singly and in combination. By fostering integration of care across subspecialty and medical-social boundaries, such systems enable treatment of the patient with disease(s), not simply treatment of disease(s) in the patient. Working closely with primary care physicians, often by telephone-mediated interaction with patients, nurse case managers may take an expanded role in meeting the challenges posed by chronic disease.


From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (Dr DeBusk and Ms Miller) and the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Dr Taylor), Stanford University School of Medicine, and the Department of Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System (Dr West), Palo Alto, Calif.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A model to evaluate quality and effectiveness of disease management
Lemmens et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2008;17:447-453.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The impact of comorbid chronic conditions on diabetes care.
Piette and Kerr
Diabetes Care 2006;29:725-731.
FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of comprehensive disease management programmes in improving clinical outcomes in heart failure patients. A meta-analysis
Roccaforte et al.
Eur J Heart Fail 2005;7:1133-1144.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group on Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular Disease
Krumholz et al.
Circulation 2005;111:3158-3166.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Care Management for Heart Failure
DeBusk et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:386-386.
FULL TEXT  

Disease Management and the Organization of Physician Practice
Casalino
JAMA 2005;293:485-488.
FULL TEXT  

Promoting Health in Type 2 Diabetes: Nurse-Physician Collaboration in Primary Care
Taylor et al.
Biol Res Nurs 2005;6:207-215.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.