 |
|
Factors Associated With Implementation of Preventive Care Measures in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
Dan A. Streja, MD;
Simon W. Rabkin, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:294-302.
Background There is only limited information on the extent to which physicians' characteristics affect the level of care and implementation of guidelines in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Objective To identify physician characteristics associated with implementation of measures for preventive care in patients with diabetes mellitus and the distribution of implementation of these measures among them.
Patients and Methods A retrospective chart audit of 519 patients eligible for health maintenance organization insurance on December 31, 1994, representing patients with diabetes receiving care from 22 primary care physician–providers of a managed care medical group in suburban North Los Angeles, Calif, and seen by physicians between January 1993 and December 1994. A short retroactive questionnaire for participating physicians was also used. The outcome measures were (1) measurement of serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; (2) urinalysis for the detection of proteinuria; and (3) ophthalmology referral for dilated fundus examination.
Results Over a period of 2 years 78% of the patients had a high-density lipoprotein cholesterol determination, 80% had a test for proteinuria, and 62% were referred to an ophthalmologist. After adjustment for patient pool differences, physicians who were perceived by the administration of the medical group as "fast," based on a blinded evaluation of their number of patient encounters per unit time, had an odds ratio of 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.95; P = .03) to obtain a high-density lipoprotein cholesterol determination in their patients and an odds ratio of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.32-0.87; P=.01) to test their patients for proteinuria. In patients requiring insulin, of fast physicians, the odds ratio for a referral for ophthalmology screening was 0.25 (95% CI, 0.07-0.85; P=.03). Duration of time in practice of over 15 years and disagreement with practice guidelines were associated with better outcomes. There was no association between physician sex, internal medicine training, or number of patients with diabetes in the practice and the implementation of outcomes. There was a highly significant association between the implementation of an outcome and the implementation of the other 2, resulting in a nonhomogeneous distribution of health care delivery. Physicians' estimate of their rate of implementation of outcomes, as assessed by the questionnaires, overestimated their actual performance while being in proportion with the documented rates. Most physicians took responsibility for the nonimplementation, accepting that it was an oversight on their part as opposed to an encounter with patient resistance.
Conclusions Most physicians believe that the lack of implementation of the measures for preventive care in patients with diabetes mellitus is an oversight. The oversight is more prevalent in the practices of busy physicians. The result is a nonhomogeneous distribution of health care. Computer reminders might be the solution.
From the Section of Endocrinology of Greater Los Angeles VA Health Care System at West Los Angeles and the Disease State Management Unit of Community Medical Group of the West Valley, Los Angeles, Calif (Dr Streja); and the Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver (Dr Rabkin).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Crossing the Quality Chasm for Diabetes Care: The Power of One Physician, His Team, and Systems Thinking
Solberg et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20:299-306.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Action or Inaction? Decision Making in Patients With Diabetes and Elevated Blood Pressure in Primary Care
Hicks et al.
Diabetes Care 2006;29:2580-2585.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Reality check: perceived versus actual performance of community mammographers.
Fenton et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006;187:42-46.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Quality of Preventive Care for Diabetes: Effects of Visit Frequency and Competing Demands
Fenton et al.
Ann Fam Med 2006;4:32-39.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Systematic Review: The Relationship between Clinical Experience and Quality of Health Care
Choudhry et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:260-273.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Physician, Organizational, and Patient Factors Associated With Suboptimal Blood Pressure Management in Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Primary Care
Schaars et al.
Diabetes Care 2004;27:123-128.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Profiling Care Provided by Different Groups of Physicians: Effects of Patient Case-Mix (Bias) and Physician-Level Clustering on Quality Assessment Results
Greenfield et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;136:111-121.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Impact of Computer-Generated Personalized Goals on HbA1c
Levetan et al.
Diabetes Care 2002;25:2-8.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Screening Mammogram Utilization in Women With Diabetes
Beckman et al.
Diabetes Care 2001;24:2049-2053.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Perceived Difficulty of Diabetes Treatment in Primary Care: Does it Differ by Patient Ethnicity?
Egede and Miohel
The Diabetes Educator 2001;27:678-684.
ABSTRACT
Is Patients' Perception of Time Spent With the Physician a Determinant of Ambulatory Patient Satisfaction?
Lin et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:1437-1442.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Barriers to Providing Diabetes Care in Community Health Centers
Chin et al.
Diabetes Care 2001;24:268-274.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Trends and Disparities in Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, and Other Cardiovascular Diseases in the United States : Findings of the National Conference on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention
Cooper et al.
Circulation 2000;102:3137-3147.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Plunging Clinical Standards Under Managed Care
Steinsmith et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1501-1501.
FULL TEXT
Office Visits Too Fast for Best Management of Diabetic Patients?
JWatch General 1999;1999:5-5.
FULL TEXT
|
