You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 7, April 12, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Echocardiography
 •Cardiac Diagnostic Tests
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Physician Estimates of Perioperative Cardiac Risk in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery

P. J. Devereaux, MD; William A. Ghali, MD, MPH; Neil E. Gibson, MD, MSc; Neil M. Skjodt, MD; David C. Ford, MD, MSc; Hude Quan, MD, PhD; Gordon H. Guyatt, MD, MSc

Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:713-717.

Background  We know little about how physicians assess perioperative cardiac risk in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.

Objectives  To evaluate preoperative medical consultations and determine the extent to which consultants used validated cardiac risk indices and specialized noninvasive cardiac tests, and to assess agreement between physician ratings of cardiac risk (low, moderate, or high) and risk estimates derived using validated cardiac risk indices or, in the case of vascular surgery, a risk index.

Methods  This observational study was conducted at 5 Canadian teaching hospitals affiliated with 2 universities. We retrospectively evaluated 308 preoperative consultations performed in 297 patients and examined the frequency with which consultants recorded the use of validated cardiac risk indices. We used {kappa} statistics to quantify the extent to which physician ratings of cardiac risk agreed with risk estimates derived using validated cardiac risk indices.

Results  Physicians recorded use of a risk index in 31% of the consultations, but the index used was almost always the suboptimal classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. The agreement between physician estimates of cardiac risk and the validated cardiac risk indices was only fair, with a weighted {kappa} of 0.38 (95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.49). Overestimation and underestimation of cardiac risk occurred in 16% and 13% of the consultations, respectively. Consultants did not order dipyridamole thallium imaging or dobutamine stress echocardiography for any moderate-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery.

Conclusions  Physicians underuse validated cardiac risk indices, and the agreement between the cardiac risk estimates and risk as determined by validated cardiac indices is suboptimal. Physicians are also underusing dipyridamole thallium imaging and dobutamine stress echocardiography for moderate-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery.


From the Departments of Medicine (Drs Devereaux, Ghali, and Skjodt) and Community Health Sciences (Drs Ghali and Quan), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; the Departments of Medicine (Drs Gibson, Ford, and Guyatt) and Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Drs Gibson and Guyatt), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(7):760-761.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Preoperative Evaluation for Major Noncardiac Surgery: Focusing on Heart Failure
Hernandez et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1729-1736.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing Cardiac Risk Assessment
Halm et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:2226-2227.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.