You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 8, April 26, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (51)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Outcome of Diabetic Foot Infections Treated Conservatively

A Retrospective Cohort Study With Long-term Follow-up

Didier Pittet, MD, MS; Blaise Wyssa, MD; Catherine Herter-Clavel, MD; Karin Kursteiner, MD; Jean Vaucher, MD; P. Daniel Lew, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:851-856.

Background  Diabetic foot lesion is associated with increased morbidity and high resource use. Although early amputation has been advocated in case of osteomyelitis, conservative treatment is a more attractive alternative.

Objective  To identify criteria predictive of failure of conservative treatment of diabetic foot ulcer at time of admission to the hospital.

Methods  We conducted a 5-year retrospective cohort study with prospective long-term follow-up of all diabetic patients admitted for a foot lesion at a large (1600-bed) teaching institution. Predetermined criteria were used for the diagnosis and classification of diabetic foot lesions (Wagner classification). Study variables included patient demographics and clinical parameters related to infection and diabetes. The average follow-up after hospital discharge was 2 years. Failure of conservative treatment was the main outcome measure. Independent predictor variables were selected by logistic regression analysis.

Results  A total of 120 diabetic patients were admitted for foot lesions; complications of contiguous osteomyelitis, deep tissue involvement, and/or gangrenous lesions occurred in 78 (74%) of the 105 patients for whom charts were available. Fourteen patients (13%) underwent immediate amputation. Conservative treatment was successful for 57 (63%) of the 91 remaining patients. Success was achieved in 21 (81%) of 26 patients presenting with skin ulcer, 35 (70%) of 50 patients with deep tissue infection or suspected osteomyelitis, and 1 (7%) of 15 patients with gangrene (P<.001, {chi}2 for trend). Independent factors predictive of failure were the presence of fever (odds ratio [OR]=1.1 per degrees Celcius; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.2) and increased serum creatinine level (OR=1.002 per micromoles per liter; 95% CI, 1.0020-1.0021) on admission, prior hospitalization for diabetic foot lesion (OR=1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6), and gangrenous lesion (OR=1.8; 95% CI, 1.5-2.2). Other patient characteristics, demographics, duration of diabetes mellitus, neutrophil count, or the anatomical site of the lesion failed to predict outcome.

Conclusions  Conservative treatment, including prolonged, culture-guided parenteral and oral antibiotics, is successful without amputation in a large proportion of diabetic patients admitted for a foot skin ulcer or suspected osteomyelitis. Future studies comparing early amputation with novel therapeutic strategies for severe diabetic foot infection should take into account currently identified factors that predicted failure of conservative treatment on admission to the hospital.


From the Division of Infectious Diseases and Clinic of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(8):886-887.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The diabetic foot
Khanolkar et al.
QJM 2008;101:685-695.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcome of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis Treated Nonsurgically: A retrospective cohort study
Senneville et al.
Diabetes Care 2008;31:637-642.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections
Lipsky et al.
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2005;95:183-210.
FULL TEXT  

Pharmacotherapy of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Smith
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2004;17:66-74.
ABSTRACT  

Pedal Abscesses in Patients Suspected of Having Pedal Osteomyelitis: Analysis with MR Imaging
Ledermann et al.
Radiology 2002;224:649-655.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rifampicin-ofloxacin oral regimen for the treatment of mild to moderate diabetic foot osteomyelitis
Senneville et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2001;48:927-930.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.