You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 1, January 10, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (43)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Attitudes and Practices Concerning the End of Life

A Comparison Between Physicians From the United States and From the Netherlands

Dick L. Willems, MD, PhD; Elisabeth R. Daniels; Gerrit van der Wal, PhD; Paul J. van der Maas, PhD; Ezekiel J. Emanuel, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:63-68.

Background  This study compares attitudes and practices concerning the end-of-life decisions between physicians in the United States and in the Netherlands, using the same set of questions.

Methods  A total of 152 physicians from Oregon and 67 from the Netherlands were interviewed using the same questions about (1) their attitudes toward increasing morphine with premature death as a likely consequence, physician-assisted suicide (PAS), and euthanasia; and (2) their involvement in cases of euthanasia, PAS, or the ending of life without an explicit request from the patient. Odds ratios, with 95% confidence intervals, were calculated to investigate relation between attitudes and various characteristics of the respondents.

Results  American physicians found euthanasia less often acceptable than the Dutch, but there was similarity in attitudes concerning increasing morphine and PAS. American physicians found increasing morphine and PAS more often acceptable in cases where patients were concerned about becoming a burden to their family. There was a discrepancy between the attitudes and practices of Dutch physicians concerning PAS. The proportions of physicians having practiced euthanasia, PAS, or ending of life without an explicit request from the patient differ more between the countries than do their attitudes, with American physicians having been involved in these practices less often than the Dutch.

Conclusions  In this study of American and Dutch physicians, 2 important differences emerge: different attitudes toward the patient who is concerned over being a burden, and different frequency of euthanasia and PAS in the two countries.


From the Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine and the Department of Social Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Drs Willems and van der Wal); the Center for Outcomes and Policy Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass (Ms Daniels and Dr Emanuel); and the Institute for Public Health, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (Dr van der Maas).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care
Cherny et al.
Palliat Med 2009;23:581-593.
ABSTRACT  

The use of sedation to relieve cancer patients' suffering at the end of life: addressing critical issues
Cherny
Ann Oncol 2009;20:1153-1155.
FULL TEXT  

Sedation for the Care of Patients with Advanced Cancer
Cherny
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed Book 2009;2009:576-582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician discussions with terminally ill patients: a cross-national comparison
Cartwright et al.
Palliat Med 2007;21:295-303.
ABSTRACT  

Feeling like a burden to others: a systematic review focusing on the end of life
McPherson et al.
Palliat Med 2007;21:115-128.
ABSTRACT  

End-of-Life Decision Making in Europe and Australia: A Physician Survey.
Onwuteaka-Philipsen et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:921-929.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Attitudes towards, and wishes for, euthanasia in advanced cancer patients at a palliative medicine unit
Johansen et al.
Palliat Med 2005;19:454-460.
ABSTRACT  

Assessing Physician Compliance With the Rules for Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide
Wolf
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1677-1679.
FULL TEXT  

The quality of medical care at the end-of-life in the USA: existing barriers and examples of process and outcome measures
Yabroff et al.
Palliat Med 2004;18:202-216.
ABSTRACT  

When is physician assisted suicide or euthanasia acceptable?
Frileux et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2003;29:330-336.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Review of the Empirical Data From the United States
Emanuel
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:142-152.
FULL TEXT  

Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in Scandinavia -- with a conceptual suggestion regarding international research in relation to the phenomena
Materstvedt and Kaasa
Palliat Med 2002;16:17-32.
ABSTRACT  

Resident Experience and Opinions About Physician-Assisted Death for Cancer Patients
Bold et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:60-64.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Attitudes and Desires Related to Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide Among Terminally Ill Patients and Their Caregivers
Emanuel et al.
JAMA 2000;284:2460-2468.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Suicide and Hastened Death: A Biopsychosocial Perspective
Hoffman
The Counseling Psychologist 2000;28:561-572.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.