You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 10, May 22, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (53)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Superiority of Lansoprazole vs Ranitidine in Healing Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug–Associated Gastric Ulcers

Results of a Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter Study

Naurang M. Agrawal, MD; Donald R. Campbell, MD; Michael A. Safdi, MD; Nancy L. Lukasik, BSN; Bidan Huang, PhD; Marian M. Haber, MD; for the NSAID-Associated Gastric Ulcer Study Group

Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1455-1461.

Background  The usefulness of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is limited by adverse gastrointestinal tract events.

Objective  To identify the optimal antisecretory therapy for healing of gastric ulcer in patients using NSAIDs and the impact of concurrent Helicobacter pylori infection on ulcer healing.

Design  Prospective, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group study.

Setting  Gastroenterology practices in ambulatory and referral center settings.

Patients  Three hundred fifty-three patients with an active, nonmalignant gastric ulcer at least 5 mm in diameter confirmed by endoscopy and biopsy and who continued to receive stable doses of NSAIDs.

Intervention  Patients were randomized to receive ranitidine hydrochloride, 150 mg twice daily, or lansoprazole, 15 mg or 30 mg once daily, for 8 weeks.

Measurements  Healing was assessed by endoscopy at 4 and 8 weeks in an intent-to-treat population. Helicobacter pylori status was assessed by histological examination.

Results  After 8 weeks of treatment, healing was observed in 61 (53%) of 115, 81 (69%) of 118, and 85 (73%) of 117 patients receiving ranitidine lansoprazole, 15 mg, and lansoprazole, 30 mg, respectively (P<.05 for ranitidine vs both lansoprazole doses; 95% confidence interval, 3.2-28.0 for ranitidine vs lansoprazole, 15 mg, and 7.4-31.8 for ranitidine vs lansoprazole, 30 mg). The gastric ulcer healing rates were similar between H pylori–infected and –noninfected patients, with a statistically significant increase with the use of lansoprazole vs ranitidine.

Conclusions  In patients who require continuous treatment with NSAIDs, lansoprazole is superior to ranitidine for healing of NSAID-associated gastric ulcers. Healing is not delayed by the presence of H pylori infection.


From the Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington (Dr Agrawal); Departments of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Kansas City, Mo (Dr Campbell), and Cincinnati, Ohio (Dr Safdi); TAP Holdings, Deerfiefld, Ill (Ms Lukasik); Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill (Dr Huang); and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Allegheny University Hospitals, Hahnemann Division, Philadelphia, Pa (Dr Haber). Dr Agrawal is now with the Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Dr Safdi, with Consultants for Clinical Research, Inc, Greater Cincinnati Gastroenterology, Cincinnati.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(10):1543.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: overall risks and management. Complementary roles for COX-2 inhibitors and proton pump inhibitors
Hawkey and Langman
Gut 2003;52:600-608.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lansoprazole and NSAID-Associated Gastric Ulcers
JWatch Gastroenterology 2000;2000:3-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.