You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 10, May 22, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Life
 •Hypertension
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Medical Therapy, Symptoms, and the Distress They Cause

Relation to Quality of Life in Patients With Angina Pectoris and/or Hypertension

Norman K. Hollenberg, MD, PhD; Gordon H. Williams, MD; Richard Anderson, EdD

Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1477-1483.

Background  Adverse events during drug therapy can be assessed through measurement of 2 features: their frequency and their severity. Their severity, in turn, can be measured by assessing the distress that they cause. Our goal was to relate the magnitude of the distress induced by treatment with calcium-channel blocking agents to the change in quality of life assessed through psychosocial instruments in patients treated with calcium-channel blocking agents, either for hypertension or for angina pectoris.

Methods  Four hundred seventy-five patients with angina pectoris were randomized to double-blind treatment with PPR (physiological pattern release) verapamil hydrochloride, amlodipine besylate, amlodipine-atenolol combination, or placebo. In addition, 557 hypertensive patients were randomized either to PPR verapamil or nifedipine GITS (gastrointestinal system). Both studies were double-blind.

Results  Significant differences in treatment of angina pectoris or hypertension, were not found between the regimens. Overall quality of life also failed to show a significant difference in either group. In both groups, however, remarkable concordance was found between the degree of distress associated with specific symptoms and a change in quality of life. An unchanged, stable symptom distress was associated with a significant improvement in the quality of life of about 0.1 SD. Improvement or erosion of symptom distress represented by 1 step was associated with a 0.1- to 0.2-SD change. The extreme change in symptom distress was associated with a substantially larger change in global quality of life.

Conclusions  The magnitude of symptom distress or relief associated with symptoms in 2 patient populations correlated strongly with a shift in quality of life. The assessment of distress associated with symptoms provides valuable additional information on drug therapy.


From the Departments of Medicine and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (Drs Hollenberg and Williams), and Commensa, Inc, Arlington, Mass (Dr Anderson).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Symptoms and the Distress They Cause: Comparison of an Aldosterone Antagonist and a Calcium Channel Blocking Agent in Patients With Systolic Hypertension
Hollenberg et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1543-1548.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Compliance with Antihypertensive Therapy after Renal Artery Stenting
Reddy et al.
Biol Res Nurs 2003;5:37-46.
ABSTRACT  

The Association of Hypertension and Secondary Cardiovascular Disease With Sleep-Disordered Breathing
Dart et al.
Chest 2003;123:244-260.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.