 |
|
Why Don't Patients and Physicians Talk About End-of-Life Care?
Barriers to Communication for Patients With Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome and Their Primary Care Clinicians
J. Randall Curtis, MD, MPH;
Donald L. Patrick, PhD, MSPH;
Ellen S. Caldwell, MS;
Ann C. Collier, MD
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1690-1696.
Background Patients with chronic and terminal disease frequently do not talk to their physicians about end-of-life care. Interventions to improve this communication have generally been unsuccessful, suggesting that important barriers to this communication must exist.
Objectives To determine the barriers to and facilitators of patient-clinician communication about end-of-life care and to identify barriers and facilitators that are more common among those patients who are least likely to discuss end-of-life care: minorities and injection drug users.
Methods We conducted a prospective study of 57 patients with advanced acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and their primary care clinicians who were recruited from university and private clinics. Barriers to and facilitators of end-of-life communication were identified from a prior qualitative study and assessed for frequency and importance and for an association with the occurrence and quality of end-of-life communication.
Results Clinicians identified more barriers than patients. Barriers identified by patients and clinicians fell into 3 categories of potential interventions: education about end-of-life care, counseling to help address end-of-life concerns, and health care system changes to facilitate patient-clinician communication. Although none of the patient-identified barriers was associated with the occurrence of communication, 2 clinician-identified barriers were associated with less communication: "the patient has not been very sick yet" and "the patient isn't ready to talk about end-of-life care." Nonwhite patients were more likely to identify the following 2 barriers than white patients: "I feel that if I talk about death, it could bring death closer" and "I don't like to talk about the care I want if I get very sick."
Conclusions The diversity of barriers and facilitators relevant to patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and their clinicians suggests that interventions to improve communication about end-of-life care must be focused on individual needs and must involve counseling interventions and health system changes in addition to education. Clinician barriers are more common and more strongly associated with the occurrence of end-of-life communication than patient barriers, suggesting that clinicians are an important target group for improving this communication.
From the Divisions of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Dr Curtis and Ms Caldwell) and Infectious Diseases (Dr Collier), Department of Medicine, and Department of Health Services (Drs Curtis and Patrick), University of Washington, Seattle.
RELATED LETTER
Barriers to Communication With Dying Patients
Daniel Reinharth, Marjorie D. Wenrich, J. Randall Curtis, Sarah E. Shannon, Jan D. Carline, Donna M. Ambrozy, and Paul G. Ramsey
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(21):2623-2624.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLES
The Patient's Response to Medical Futility
David C. McGee, Ann B. Weinacker, and Thomas A. Raffin
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(11):1565-1566.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Attitudes of Patients With Advanced AIDS Toward Use of the Medical Futility Rationale in Decisions to Forgo Mechanical Ventilation
J. Randall Curtis, Donald L. Patrick, Ellen S. Caldwell, and Ann C. Collier
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(11):1597-1601.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(11):1708-1709.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Effect of a population-based educational intervention focusing on end-of-life home care, life-prolonging treatment and knowledge about palliative care
Miyashita et al.
Palliat Med 2008;22:376-382.
ABSTRACT
Truth-telling in discussing prognosis in advanced life-limiting illnesses: a systematic review
Hancock et al.
Palliat Med 2007;21:507-517.
ABSTRACT
Preferences regarding end-of-life cancer care and associations with good-death concepts: a population-based survey in Japan
Sanjo et al.
Ann Oncol 2007;18:1539-1547.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Systematic review of educational interventions in palliative care for primary care physicians.
Alvarez and Agra
Palliat Med 2006;20:673-683.
ABSTRACT
Advance Care Planning in a Frail Older Population: Patient Versus Program Influences
Temkin-Greener et al.
Research on Aging 2005;27:659-691.
ABSTRACT
Palliative and End-of-Life Care for Patients With Cardiopulmonary Diseases: American College of Chest Physicians Position Statement
Selecky et al.
Chest 2005;128:3599-3610.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The End-of-Life Family Conference: Communication Empowers
Azoulay
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005;171:803-804.
FULL TEXT
Access and equity in HIV/AIDS palliative care: a review of the evidence and responses
Harding et al.
Palliat Med 2005;19:251-258.
ABSTRACT
Junior versus Senior Physicians for Informing Families of Intensive Care Unit Patients
Moreau et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2004;169:512-517.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Hope and Hopelessness at the End of Life
Sullivan
AJGP 2003;11:393-405.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Value of Disease Severity in Predicting Patient Readiness to Address End-of-Life Issues
Pfeifer et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:609-612.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Enhancing Physician-Patient Communication
Lee et al.
ASH Education Book 2002;2002:464-483.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Barriers to Communication With Dying Patients
Reinharth et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2623-2624.
FULL TEXT
End-of-Life Discussions and Preferences Among Persons With HIV
Wenger et al.
JAMA 2001;285:2880-2887.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
End-of-life issues in AIDS: the research perspective
Grady et al.
JRSM 2001;94:479-482.
FULL TEXT
Barriers to Discussing End-of-Life Care
JWatch General 2000;2000:4-4.
FULL TEXT
|
