This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (34)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Oncology  • Surgery  • Colorectal Surgery  • Gastrointestinal Diseases  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Robert E. Schoen, MD, MPH; Joel L. Weissfeld, MD, MPH; Nancy J. Bowen, DrPH; Galen Switzer, PhD; Andrew Baum, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1790-1796.

Background  Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is an underused cancer prevention procedure. Physicians often cite patient discomfort as a reason for not requesting sigmoidoscopy, but patient experiences and attitudes toward sigmoidoscopy have not been well studied.

Objective  To measure patient satisfaction and the determinants of satisfaction with screening sigmoidoscopy.

Methods  An instrument to assess satisfaction with screening sigmoidoscopy was developed. Responses were evaluated with a factor analysis, tested for reproducibility and internal consistency, and validated against an external standard.

Results  A total of 1221 patients (666 men and 555 women; mean age, 61.8 years) were surveyed after sigmoidoscopy. Examinations were performed by a nurse practitioner (n=668), internist (n=344), or gastrointestinal specialist (n=184). More than 93% of the participants strongly agreed or agreed they would be willing to undergo another examination, and 74.9% would strongly recommend the procedure to their friends. Regarding pain and discomfort, 76.2% strongly agreed or agreed that the examination did not cause a lot of pain, 78.1% stated that it did not cause a lot of discomfort, and 68.5% thought that it was more comfortable than they expected. Fifteen percent to 25% of the patients indicated they had a lot of pain, great discomfort, or more discomfort than expected. Women were more likely to have significant pain or discomfort than men (adjusted odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-4.3; P<.001).

Conclusions  Approximately 70% of individuals who undergo screening sigmoidoscopy are satisfied and find the procedure more comfortable than expected, whereas only 15% to 25% find the procedure unpleasant. Physicians should not project discomfort onto patients as a reason for not requesting screening sigmoidoscopy.

From the Departments of Medicine (Drs Schoen, Bowen, and Switzer), Epidemiology (Drs Schoen and Weissfeld), and Psychiatry (Drs Switzer and Baum) and the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute (Drs Schoen, Weissfeld, and Baum), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(12):1879-1880.
FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Comparison of Satisfaction with Cancer Screening at Mobile Van and Static Sites: National Cancer Screening Program in Korea
Yoon et al.
Jpn J Clin Oncol 2009;39:169-174.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Incomplete screening flexible sigmoidoscopy associated with female sex, age, and increased risk of colorectal cancer
Doria-Rose et al.
Gut 2005;54:1273-1278.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Flexible Sigmoidoscopy in the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial: Results From the Baseline Screening Examination of a Randomized Trial
Weissfeld et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:989-997.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group
Levin et al.
Gut 2005;54:807-813.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Life and Trial Adherence Among Participants in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial
Taylor et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1083-1094.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Colorectal Neoplasia Screening with CT Colonography in Average-Risk Asymptomatic Subjects: Community-based Study
Edwards et al.
Radiology 2004;230:459-464.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acceptance by Patients of Multidetector CT Colonography Compared with Barium Enema Examinations, Flexible Sigmoidoscopy, and Colonoscopy
Taylor et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003;181:913-921.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy performed by nurses: scope for the future?
Smale et al.
Gut 2003;52:1090-1094.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Results of Repeat Sigmoidoscopy 3 Years After a Negative Examination
Schoen et al.
JAMA 2003;290:41-48.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT