You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 12, June 26, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (36)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Nursing Care
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Physician, Nurse, and Social Worker Collaboration in Primary Care for Chronically Ill Seniors

Lucia S. Sommers, DrPH; Keith I. Marton, MD; Joseph C. Barbaccia, MD, MPH; Janeane Randolph, MSW

Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1825-1833.

Objective  To examine the impact of an interdisciplinary, collaborative practice intervention involving a primary care physician, a nurse, and a social worker for community-dwelling seniors with chronic illnesses.

Methods  A concurrent, controlled cohort study of 543 patients in 18 private office practices of primary care physicians was conducted. The intervention group received care from their primary care physician working with a registered nurse and a social worker, while the control group received care as usual from their primary care physician. The outcome measures included changes in number of hospital admissions, readmissions, office visits, emergency department visits, skilled nursing facility admissions, home care visits, and changes in patient self-rated physical, emotional, and social functioning.

Results  From 1992 (baseline year) to 1993, the two groups did not differ in service use or in self-reported health status. From 1993 to 1994, the hospitalization rate of the control group increased from 0.34 to 0.52, while the rate in the intervention group stayed at baseline (P=.03). The proportion of intervention patients with readmissions decreased from 6% to 4%, while the rate in the control group increased from 4% to 9% (P=.03). In the intervention group, mean office visits to all physicians fell by 1.5 visits compared with a 0.5-visit increase for the control group (P=.003). The patients in the intervention group reported an increase in social activities compared with the control group's decrease (P=.04). With fewer hospital admissions, average per-patient savings for 1994 were estimated at $90, inclusive of the intervention's cost but exclusive of savings from fewer office visits.

Conclusions  This model of primary care collaborative practice shows potential for reducing utilization and maintaining health status for seniors with chronic illnesses. Future work should explore the specific benefit accruing from physician involvement in the collaborative practice team.


From the Internal Medicine Residency Program, St Mary's Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif (Dr Sommers); Legacy Health System, Portland, Ore (Dr Marton); Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (Dr Barbaccia); and Elder Care Alliance, Oakland, Calif (Ms Randolph).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Geriatric Care Management for Low-Income Seniors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Counsell et al.
JAMA 2007;298:2623-2633.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guided Care for Multimorbid Older Adults: Kathleen Walsh Piercy, PhD, Editor
Boyd et al.
Gerontologist 2007;47:697-704.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supporting self-management for patients with complex medical needs: recommendations of a working group
Bayliss et al.
Chronic Illness 2007;3:167-175.
ABSTRACT  

Managing Complex Medication Regimens: Perspectives of Consumers with Osteoarthritis and Healthcare Professionals
Manias et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2007;41:764-771.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bringing geriatricians to the front lines: evaluation of a quality improvement intervention in primary care.
Fenton et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:331-339.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Team Performance and Risk-Adjusted Health Outcomes in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE)
Mukamel et al.
Gerontologist 2006;46:227-237.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Moving beyond Round Pegs and Square Holes: Restructuring Medicare To Improve Chronic Care
Wolff and Boult
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:439-445.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is There Time for Management of Patients With Chronic Diseases in Primary Care?
Ostbye et al.
Ann Fam Med 2005;3:209-214.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

When Most Doctors Are Women: What Lies Ahead?
Levinson and Lurie
ANN INTERN MED 2004;141:471-474.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Can Health Care Teams Improve Primary Care Practice?
Grumbach and Bodenheimer
JAMA 2004;291:1246-1251.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Team Functioning and IT Innovation: A Study of the Diffusion of a Point-of-care Online Evidence System
Gosling et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2003;10:244-251.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are Fortune 100 Companies Responsive To Chronically Ill Workers?
Montenegro-Torres et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20:209-219.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.