You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 15, August 14, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (24)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Transplantation
 •Kidney Transplantation
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Sex Inequality in Kidney Transplantation Rates

Douglas E. Schaubel, BMath, MSc; Donna E. Stewart, MD, FRCPC; Howard I. Morrison, PhD; Deborah L. Zimmerman, MD, FRCPC; Jill I. Cameron, MSc; John J. Jeffery, MD, FRCPC; Stanley S. A. Fenton, MD, FRCPI

Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2349-2354.

Background  Men in the United States undergoing renal replacement therapy are more likely than women to receive a kidney transplant. However, the ability to pay may, in part, be responsible for this finding.

Objective  To compare adult male and female transplantation rates in a setting in which equal access to medical treatment is assumed.

Methods  Using data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Register, the rate of first transplantations was computed for the 20,131 men and the 13,458 women aged 20 years or older who initiated renal replacement therapy between January 1, 1981, and December 31, 1996. Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate the male-female transplantation rate ratio, adjusting for age, race, province, calendar period, underlying disease leading to renal failure, and dialytic modality. Actuarial survival methods were used to compare transplantation probability for covariable-matched cohorts of men and women.

Results  Men experienced 20% greater covariable-adjusted kidney transplantation rates relative to women (rate ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.27). The sex disparity was stronger for cadaveric transplants (rate ratio, 1.23) compared with those from living donors (rate ratio, 1.10). The 5-year probability of receiving a transplant was 47% for men and 39% for women within covariable-matched cohorts (P<.001). The sex disparity in transplantation rates increased with increasing age. The sex effect was weaker among whites and Oriental persons (Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, Cambodian, Laotian, Filipino, Malaysian, Indonesian, and Korean) and stronger among blacks, Asian Indians (Indian, Pakistani, and Sri Lankan), and North American Indians (aboriginal).

Conclusion  Since survival probability and quality of life are superior for patients who undergo transplantation relative to those who undergo dialysis, an increased effort should be made to distribute kidneys available for transplantation more equitably by sex among patients undergoing renal replacement therapy.


From the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario (Mr Schaubel and Dr Morrison); the Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Mr Schaubel); the Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network (Drs Stewart, Zimmerman, and Fenton and Ms Cameron), the Women's Health Program (Dr Stewart and Ms Cameron), the Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto (Drs Stewart, Zimmerman, and Fenton), and the Division of Nephrology, Toronto General Hospital (Drs Zimmerman and Fenton), Toronto, Ontario; and the Section of Nephrology, Health Science Center, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg (Dr Jeffery).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(15):2404.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Age and Comorbidities Are Effect Modifiers of Gender Disparities in Renal Transplantation
Segev et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009;20:621-628.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association between proximity to the attending nephrologist and mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis
Tonelli et al.
CMAJ 2007;177:1039-1044.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The influence of socio-demographic factors, treatment perceptions and attitudes to living donation on willingness to consider living kidney donor among kidney transplant candidates
Zimmerman et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:2569-2576.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Residence location and likelihood of kidney transplantation.
Tonelli et al.
CMAJ 2006;175:478-482.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use and Outcomes of Peritoneal Dialysis among Aboriginal People in Canada
Tonelli et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2005;16:482-488.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Death and renal transplantation among Aboriginal people undergoing dialysis
Tonelli et al.
CMAJ 2004;171:577-582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A multicentre study of registration on renal transplantation waiting list of the elderly and patients with type 2 diabetes
Villar et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:207-214.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Equity of access to renal transplant waiting list and renal transplantation in Scotland: cohort study
Oniscu et al.
BMJ 2003;327:1261.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Genetic Technologies and Women: The Importance of Context Inmaculada de Melo-Martin St. Mary's University
Hanks
Bulletin of Science Technology Society 2001;21:354-360.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.