You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 16, September 11, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Dying Well After Discontinuing the Life-Support Treatment of Dialysis

Lewis M. Cohen, MD; Michael J. Germain, MD; David M. Poppel, MD; Anne L. Woods, LICSW; Penelope S. Pekow, PhD; Carl M. Kjellstrand, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2513-2518.

Background  Cessation of life-prolonging treatments precedes death in an increasing number of cases, but little attention has been accorded to the quality of dying.

Objective  To examine the quality of dying following dialysis termination.

Patients and Methods  A prospective cohort, observational study involved 6 dialysis clinics in the United States and 2 clinics in Canada, and 131 adult patients receiving maintenance dialysis who died after treatment cessation. Sixty percent (n = 79) underwent patient (n = 23) and/or family (n = 76) interviews and follow-up with caretakers. A quality of dying tool quantified duration, pain and suffering, and psychosocial factors.

Results  The sample was 59% female, the age was 70.0 ± 1.2 years old, the duration of dialysis was 34.0 ± 2.8 months, and death occurred 8.2 ± 0.7 days after the last dialysis treatment. (Data are given as mean ± SE.) Thirty-eight percent of the subjects who completed the protocol were judged to have had very good deaths, 47% had good deaths, and 15% had bad deaths. During the last day of life, 81% of the sample did not suffer, although 42% had some pain and an additional 5% had severe pain. According to the psychosocial domain of the quality of dying measure, patients who died at home or with hospice care had better deaths than those who died in a hospital or nursing home.

Conclusions  Most deaths following withdrawal of dialysis were good or very good. The influence of site of death and physician attitudes about decisions to stop life support deserves more research attention. Quality of dying tools can be used to establish benchmarks for the provision of terminal care.


From the Department of Psychiatry, Baystate Medical Center (Dr Cohen and Ms Woods), and Western New England Renal Associates (Drs Germain and Poppel), Springfield, Mass; School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (Dr Pekow); and the Department of Medicine, Loyola Medical Center, Chicago, Ill, and Aksys Ltd, Lincolnshire, Ill (Dr Kjellstrand).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Symptom burden, quality of life, advance care planning and the potential value of palliative care in severely ill haemodialysis patients
Weisbord et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003;18:1345-1352.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Practical Considerations in Dialysis Withdrawal: "To Have That Option Is a Blessing"
Cohen et al.
JAMA 2003;289:2113-2119.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Depression and Suicidal Ideation in Patients Who Discontinue the Life-Support Treatment of Dialysis
Cohen et al.
Psychosom. Med. 2002;64:889-896.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.