You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 19, October 23, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (22)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Friend or Foe?

How Primary Care Physicians Perceive Hospitalists

Alicia Fernandez, MD; Kevin Grumbach, MD; Lara Goitein, MD; Karen Vranizan, MA; Dennis H. Osmond, PhD; Andrew B. Bindman, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2902-2908.

Background  Increased use of hospitalists is redefining the role of primary care physicians. Whether primary care physicians welcome this transition is unknown. We examined primary care physicians' perceptions of how hospitalists affect their practices, their patient relationships, and overall patient care.

Methods  A mailed survey of randomly selected general internists, general pediatricians, and family practitioners with experience with hospitalists practicing in California.

Main Outcome Measures  Physicians' self-reports of hospitalists' effects on quality of patient care and on their own practices.

Results  Seven hundred eight physicians were eligible for this study, and there was a 74% response rate. Of the 524 physicians who responded, 34% were internists, 38% were family practitioners, and 29% were pediatricians. Of the 524 respondents, 335 (64%) had hospitalists available to them and 120 (23%) were required to use hospitalists for all admissions. Physicians perceived hospitalists as increasing (41%) or not changing (44%) the overall quality of care and perceived their practice style differences as neutral or beneficial. Twenty-eight percent of primary care physicians believed that the quality of the physician-patient relationship decreased; 69% reported that hospitalists did not affect their income; 53% believed that hospitalists decreased their workload; and 50% believed that hospitalists increased practice satisfaction. In a multivariate model predicting physician perceptions, internists, physicians who attributed loss of income to hospitalists, and physicians in mandatory hospitalist systems viewed hospitalists less favorably.

Conclusions  Practicing primary care physicians have generally favorable perceptions of hospitalists' effect on patients and on their own practice satisfaction, especially in voluntary hospitalist systems that decrease the workload of primary care physicians and do not threaten their income. Primary care physicians, particularly internists, are less accepting of mandatory hospitalist systems.


From the Primary Care Research Center (Drs Fernandez, Grumbach, Osmond, and Bindman and Ms Vranizan) and Division of General Internal Medicine (Drs Fernandez and Bindman and Ms Vranizan), San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, Calif; Departments of Medicine (Drs Fernandez, Osmond, and Bindman), Family and Community Medicine (Dr Grumbach), and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Ms Vranizan and Drs Osmond and Bindman) and Center for California Health Workforce Studies (Drs Grumbach and Bindman and Ms Vranizan), University of California, San Francisco; and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (Dr Goitein).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(19):3010-3011.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Invited Article: Is it time for neurohospitalists?
Freeman et al.
Neurology 2008;70:1282-1288.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

ASHP-SHM Joint Statement on Hospitalist-Pharmacist Collaboration
Cobaugh et al.
Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008;65:260-263.
FULL TEXT  

Outcomes of Care by Hospitalists, General Internists, and Family Physicians
Lindenauer et al.
NEJM 2007;357:2589-2600.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pediatric Hospitalists: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Landrigan et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:1736-1744.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pediatric Hospitalists: Report of a Leadership Conference
Lye et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:1122-1130.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Powerlessness, Control, and Complexity: The Experience of Family Physicians in a Group Model HMO
Gask
Ann Fam Med 2004;2:150-155.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How Physicians Perceive Hospitalist Services After Implementation: Anticipation vs Reality
Auerbach et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2330-2336.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Who is Caring for the Underserved? A Comparison of Primary Care Physicians and Nonphysician Clinicians in California and Washington
Grumbach et al.
Ann Fam Med 2003;1:97-104.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Primary care in the United States: Organisation of primary care in the United States
Bindman and Majeed
BMJ 2003;326:631-634.
FULL TEXT  

The Hospitalist Movement 5 Years Later
Wachter and Goldman
JAMA 2002;287:487-494.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.