You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 20, November 13, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (40)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Patient Education/ Health Literacy
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Quality Improvement Initiative and Its Impact on the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Rajendra H. Mehta, MD; Sugata Das, MD; Thomas T. Tsai, MD; Elsie Nolan, MS, RN, CS; Gwen Kearly, BSN, RN, CCRN; Kim A. Eagle, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3057-3062.

Background  Wide variation exists in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) management, leading to differences in outcomes.

Objective  To assess the impact of the quality improvement initiative on appropriate management of AMI.

Design  Prospective patient identification, retrospective medical record review.

Patients  All patients with AMI discharged alive (N = 497) from our institution between April 1, 1995, and February 28, 1997.

Main Outcome Measure  The effect of quality improvements directed at the patient, nurse, and physician on the adherence to key quality indicators.

Results  The quality improvement initiative correlated with more frequent use of reperfusion therapy (98%), and with aspirin use in the emergency department (95%), in ideal eligible patients. Similarly, adherence to discharge quality indicators, including use of aspirin (97%), {beta}-blockers (94%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (90%), and lipid-lowering agents (67%); avoidance of calcium channel blockers (93%); a low-fat diet (96%); smoking cessation counseling (94%); and outpatient rehabilitation referral (70%) was higher, including in the very old (those aged >=80 years) and in women. The use of a patient education tool was associated with a higher adherence to most quality indicators compared with patients in whom this was not used: discharge aspirin (99% vs 96%; P = .02), {beta}-blocker (98% vs 91%; P = .002), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (95% vs 86%; P = .01), and lipid-lowering agent (71% vs 62%; P = .04) use; outpatient rehabilitation (82% vs 63%; P=.001); and documentation of smoking cessation counseling (98% vs 87%; P = .001).

Conclusions  Implementation of a quality improvement program was associated with a high adherence to quality-of-care indicators for AMI. Patient-directed feedback before discharge improved adherence to key indicators for AMI beyond that achieved with tools only directed at caregivers.


From the Heart Care Program and the Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology
Authors/Task Force Members et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:1598-1660.
FULL TEXT  

Long-Term and Short-Term Changes in Antihypertensive Prescribing by Office-Based Physicians in the United States
Stafford et al.
Hypertension 2006;48:213-218.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sex Differences in the Application of Evidence-Based Therapies for the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction: The American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice Projects in Michigan.
Jani et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1164-1170.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Integrating "Best of Care" Protocols into Clinicians' Workflow via Care Provider Order Entry: Impact on Quality-of-Care Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Ozdas et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2006;13:188-196.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guideline-Based Standardized Care Is Associated With Substantially Lower Mortality in Medicare Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: The American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) Projects in Michigan
Eagle et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1242-1248.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimising care of acute coronary syndromes in three Australian hospitals
Scott et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16:275-284.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Enhancing quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: shifting the focus of improvement from key indicators to process of care and tool use: The American College of Cardiology Acute Myocardial Infarction Guidelines Applied in Practice Project in Michigan: Flint and Saginaw Expansion
Mehta et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:2166-2173.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Factors Associated with the Successful Implementation of a Quality Improvement Project in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Ambulatory Care Clinics
Warner et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2004;19:75-82.
ABSTRACT  

Get With the Guidelines for Cardiovascular Secondary Prevention: Pilot Results
LaBresh et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:203-209.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Quality of Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) Initiative
Mehta et al.
JAMA 2002;287:1269-1276.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

From Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice: Bridging the GAP
Rich
JAMA 2002;287:1321-1323.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.