You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 21, November 27, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (52)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Lipids and Lipid Disorders
 •Women's Health
 •Menopause
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Effects of Continuous Estrogen and Estrogen-Progestin Replacement Regimens on Cardiovascular Risk Markers in Postmenopausal Women

Michael H. Davidson, MD; Kevin C. Maki, PhD; Phyllis Marx, MD; Ann C. Maki, MS, RD; Mary Sue Cyrowski, RD; Nayan Nanavati, MS; Joan-Carles Arce, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3315-3325.

Objective  To evaluate the influence of 2 continuous combined estrogen-progestin replacement products, compared with unopposed estrogen and placebo, on cardiovascular risk markers in postmenopausal women in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Methods  Two hundred seventy healthy postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups: placebo, unopposed 17-{beta} estradiol (1 mg), 1 mg of 17-{beta} estradiol with 0.25 mg of norethindrone acetate, or 1 mg of 17-{beta} estradiol with 0.5 mg of norethindrone acetate. The primary outcome variable was change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration. Additional outcome variables included changes in other serum lipid levels, hemostatic variables, and indicators of carbohydrate metabolism.

Results  The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was reduced to a similar degree in all groups receiving active treatment (10%-14% from baseline; P = .001 for17-{beta} estradiol with 0.5 mg of norethindrone acetate, P = .004 for 17-{beta} estradiol with 0.25 mg of norethindrone acetate, and P = .001 for 1 mg of 17-{beta} estradiol vs placebo). Compared with unopposed 17-{beta} estradiol, 17-{beta} estradiol with 0.5 mg of norethindrone acetate enhanced the reductions in total cholesterol and apolipoprotein B levels (P<.01 vs 17-{beta} estradiol). 17-{beta} Estradiol plus norethindrone blunted or reversed the increases in levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I, and triglycerides produced by 17-{beta} estradiol alone. Effects of 17-{beta} estradiol plus norethindrone on hemostatic variables were similar to those of 17-{beta} estradiol except for factor VII activity, which was significantly reduced with 17-{beta} estradiol combined with 0.25 mg (P<.01) and 0.5 mg (P<.05) of norethindrone acetate. 17-{beta} Estradiol plus norethindrone appeared to blunt reductions in C-peptide and insulin levels produced by unopposed 17-{beta} estradiol but did not elevate these values compared with placebo.

Conclusions  17-{beta} Estradiol plus norethindrone produced favorable changes in most cardiovascular risk markers evaluated and has a profile distinct from that of unopposed 17-{beta} estradiol. The impact of these differences on cardiovascular events warrants investigation.


From the Chicago Center for Clinical Research, Chicago, Ill (Drs Davidson, Maki, and Marx and Mss Maki and Cyrowski); and Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Princeton, NJ (Mr Nanavati and Dr Arce).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Is ezetimibe/simvastatin no better than simvastatin alone? Lessons learned and clinical implications
DAVIDSON
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 2008;75:479-496.
FULL TEXT  

Review Article: Vascular and Metabolic Effects of Sex Steroids: New Insights Into Clinical Trials
Wierman and Kohrt
Reproductive Sciences 2007;14:300-314.
ABSTRACT  

Effects of Sex and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Prevalence of Isolated Impaired Fasting Glucose and Isolated Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Subjects With a Family History of Type 2 Diabetes
van Genugten et al.
Diabetes 2006;55:3529-3535.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association of serum proinsulin with hormone replacement therapy in nondiabetic older women: the rancho bernardo study.
Kim and Barrett-Connor
Diabetes Care 2006;29:618-624.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Role of the Estrogen and Progestin in Hormonal Replacement Therapy on Apolipoprotein A-I Kinetics in Postmenopausal Women
Lamon-Fava et al.
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 2006;26:385-391.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Body Mass Index and Insulin Resistance
Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:5S-10S.
FULL TEXT  

The Effect of Different Doses of Micronized 17{beta}-Estradiol on C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin-6, and Lipids in Older Women
Prestwood et al.
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2004;59:M827-M832.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Should Progestins Be Blamed for the Failure of Hormone Replacement Therapy to Reduce Cardiovascular Events in Randomized Controlled Trials?
Koh and Sakuma
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 2004;24:1171-1179.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Identifying patients at risk of coronary vascular disease: the potential role of inflammatory markers
Kluft
Eur Heart J Suppl 2004;6:C21-C27.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Transdermal 17-{beta}-Estradiol and Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes in a Population of Healthy, Nonobese Postmenopausal Women
Rossi et al.
Diabetes Care 2004;27:645-649.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diabetes Issues in Women and Children: Polycystic ovary syndrome
Bloomgarden
Diabetes Care 2003;26:2457-2463.
FULL TEXT  

Effects of Postmenopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy on HbA1c Levels
Okada et al.
Diabetes Care 2003;26:1088-1092.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Glycemic Effects of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy: The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Kanaya et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:1-9.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Flaxseed Dietary Supplement Versus Hormone Replacement Therapy in Hypercholesterolemic Menopausal Women
Lemay et al.
Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:495-504.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.