You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 5, March 13, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (28)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal

Physicians' Ethical Beliefs About Cost-Control Arrangements

Daniel P. Sulmasy, OFM, MD, PhD; M. Gregg Bloche, MD, JD; Jean M. Mitchell, PhD; Jack Hadley, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:649-657.

Background  Although much has been written about the ethics of new methods of health care financing, little is known about the extent to which physicians experience these cost-control arrangements as ethical problems.

Method  A cross-sectional telephone survey of 1549 physicians, 8 to 17 years after residency, randomly selected from 75 US metropolitan service areas (response rate, 74.0%).

Results  Only 17.0% believed that financial incentives to limit services are ethically acceptable. Although 52.9% thought that physicians should try to abide by guidelines discouraging the use of interventions with possible but unproven benefit, only 14.5% thought such guidelines should be enforced by payers. Only 5.7% thought that it was morally acceptable for payers to discourage physicians from telling patients about their personal financial incentives, and only 9.1% found compliance with such restrictions morally acceptable. Changes in the health care system in the past 5 years were believed to have had a negative impact on their own patients' trust in them by 50.6%, and 80.8% believed that changes in the health care system in the past decade have diminished physicians' commitment to an ethic of undivided loyalty to patients. In multiple regression analysis, physicians who reported that the overall personal financial incentives in their practices encouraged them to reduce services were significantly more likely to have ethical objections to such incentives, to believe their own patients' trust in them had diminished, and to believe that the ethic of undivided loyalty to patients had diminished.

Conclusions  Many of the methods now commonly used to influence medical decision making are considered ethically objectionable by most midcareer physicians. Whether their ethical disquiet about these arrangements is justified cannot be answered from these data.


From The John J. Conley Department of Ethics, St Vincents Hospital, New York, NY (Dr Sulmasy); The Bioethics Institute, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY (Dr Sulmasy); and The Georgetown University Law Center (Dr Bloche), the Departments of Public Policy (Dr Mitchell) and Medicine (Dr Hadley), and the Institute for Health Care Research and Policy (Drs Mitchell and Hadley), Georgetown University, Washington, DC.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(5):718-719.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Incentive Implementation in Physician Practices: A Qualitative Study of Practice Executive Perspectives on Pay for Performance
Bokhour et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2006;63:73S-95S.
ABSTRACT  

A Path Analytic Model of Ethical Conflict in Practice and Autonomy in a Sample of Nurse Practitioners
Ulrich and Soeken
Nurs Ethics 2005;12:305-316.
ABSTRACT  

Physicians' Responses to Resource Constraints
Hurst et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:639-644.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Single-Payer National Health Insurance: Physicians' Views
McCormick et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:300-304.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The "Hassle Factor": What Motivates Physicians to Manipulate Reimbursement Rules?
Werner et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1134-1139.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Profits and professionalism
Sade
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2002;123:403-405.
FULL TEXT  

How Disclosing HMO Physician Incentives Affects Trust
Hall et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21:197-206.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Managing Uncertainty: Intermediate Organizations as Triple Agents
Casalino
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2001;26:1055-1068.
 

The Market for Medical Ethics
Bloche
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2001;26:1099-1112.
 

The Supreme Court and Bedside Rationing
Bloche and Jacobson
JAMA 2000;284:2776-2779.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-Control Arrangements and Misdirected Loyalty
Goldstein et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2547-2548.
FULL TEXT  

Fidelity and Deceit at the Bedside
Bloche
JAMA 2000;283:1881-1884.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.