You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 6, March 27, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (36)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal

Payer Status and the Utilization of Hospital Resources in Acute Myocardial Infarction

A Report From the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2

John G. Canto, MD, MSPH; William J. Rogers, MD; William J. French, MD; Joel M. Gore, MD; Nisha C. Chandra, MD; Hal V. Barron, MD; for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators

Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:817-823.

Background  Prior studies have suggested that payer status may be an important determinant of medical resource utilization and outcome in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Methods  A national cohort of 332 221 patients with AMI enrolled from June 1994 to July 1996 were compared within 5 payer groups to ascertain the influence of payer status on hospital resource allocation for AMI in the United States.

Results  Medicare comprised the largest proportion (56%), followed by commercial insurance (25%), health maintenance organization (HMO) (10%), uninsured (6%), and Medicaid (3%). Compared with commercially insured patients, Medicare and Medicaid patients received fewer reperfusion therapies, underwent fewer invasive cardiac procedures, and had longer hospitalizations. After adjusting for differences in clinical characteristics, Medicare recipients were as likely as commercially insured patients to receive acute reperfusion therapies or any invasive cardiac procedure. Uninsured and HMO patients tended to utilize hospital resources with intermediate frequency. Medicare recipients aged 65 years or older and the HMO group had similar hospital mortality rates compared with the commercial group (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96-1.20 and OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83-1.04, respectively), but Medicaid and uninsured groups had higher hospital mortality rates compared with the commercial group (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.14-1.48 and OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.12-1.48, respectively).

Conclusion  This report suggests significant variation by payer status in the management of AMI throughout the United States, but no important differences in mortality among the 3 largest payer groups.


From the University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham (Drs Canto and Rogers); Harbor UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, Calif (Dr French); the University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester (Dr Gore); Johns Hopkins Bayview, Baltimore, Md (Dr Chandra); and the University of California at San Francisco and Genentech, Inc (Dr Barron), South San Francisco. A list of hospitals participating in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 can be obtained from ClinTrials Research, Inc.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(6):873-874.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Eroding Access Among Nonelderly U.S. Adults With Chronic Conditions: Ten Years Of Change
Hoffman and Schwartz
Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:w340-w348.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Development of Systems of Care for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: Current State of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care
Faxon
Circulation 2007;116:e29-e32.
FULL TEXT  

Physician-attributable Differences in Intensive Care Unit Costs: A Single-Center Study
Garland et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006;174:1206-1210.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Insurance Coverage and Care of Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes.
Calvin et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:739-748.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving the ICU: Part 1
Garland
Chest 2005;127:2151-2164.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Can Doctors and Nurses Recognize Depression in Patients Hospitalized With an Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Absence of Formal Screening?
Ziegelstein et al.
Psychosom. Med. 2005;67:393-397.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Time to Acute Reperfusion Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Myocardial Infarction
Bradley et al.
JAMA 2004;292:1563-1572.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acute Coronary Syndromes Without Chest Pain, An Underdiagnosed and Undertreated High-Risk Group: Insights From The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events
Brieger et al.
Chest 2004;126:461-469.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health Insurance Coverage And Mortality Among The Near-Elderly
McWilliams et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;23:223-233.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does Supplemental Private Insurance Affect Care of Medicare Recipients Hospitalized for Myocardial Infarction?
Fang and Alderman
Am. J. Public Health 2004;94:778-782.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sicker and Poorer--The Consequences of Being Uninsured: A Review of the Research on the Relationship between Health Insurance, Medical Care Use, Health, Work, and Income
Hadley
Med Care Res Rev 2003;60:3S-75S.
ABSTRACT  

The Association of Sex and Payer Status on Management and Subsequent Survival in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Canto et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:587-593.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Presidential address: quality of cardiovascular care in the U.S.
Beller
J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:587-594.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.