 |
|
The Accuracy of Physical Examination to Detect Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Howard A. Fink, MD;
Frank A. Lederle, MD;
Craig S. Roth, MD;
Carolyn A. Bowles, MD;
David B. Nelson, PhD;
Michele A. Haas, BA
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:833-836.
Background Abdominal palpation during physical examination is an important means of detecting abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), but limited information is available on its accuracy.
Methods Two hundred subjects (aged 51-88 years), 99 with and 101 without AAA as determined by previous ultrasound, each underwent physical examination of the abdomen by 2 internists who were blinded to each other's findings and to the ultrasound diagnosis.
Results The overall accuracy of abdominal palpation for detecting AAA was as follows: sensitivity, 68% (95% confidence interval [CI], 60%-76%); specificity, 75% (95% CI, 68%-82%); positive likelihood ratio, 2.7 (95% CI, 2.0-3.6); negative likelihood ratio 0.43 (95% CI, 0.33-0.56). Interobserver pair agreement for AAA vs no AAA between the first and second examinations was 77% ( = 0.53). Sensitivity increased with AAA diameter, from 61% for AAAs of 3.0 to 3.9 cm, to 69% for AAAs of 4.0 to 4.9 cm, 72% for AAAs of 4.0 cm or larger, and 82% for AAAs of 5.0 cm or larger. Sensitivity in subjects with an abdominal girth less than 100 cm (40-in waistline) was 91% vs 53% for girth of 100 cm or greater (P<.001). When girth was 100 cm or greater and the aorta was palpable, sensitivity was 82%. When girth was less than 100 cm and the AAA was 5.0 cm or larger, sensitivity was 100% (12 examinations). Factors independently associated with correct examination findings included AAA diameter (odds ratio [OR], 1.95 per centimeter increase; 95% CI, 1.06-3.58); abdominal girth (OR, 0.90 per centimeter increase; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94); and the examiner's assessment that the abdomen was not tight (OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.17-6.13).
Conclusions Abdominal palpation has only moderate overall sensitivity for detecting AAA, but appears to be highly sensitive for diagnosis of AAAs large enough to warrant elective intervention in patients who do not have a large girth. Abdominal palpation has good sensitivity even in patients with a large girth if the aorta is palpable.
From the Department of Medicine and Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(6):873-874.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Emergency abdominal aortic aneurysm presenting without haemodynamic shock is associated with misdiagnosis and delay in appropriate clinical management
Gaughan et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2009;26:334-339.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Circulating Markers of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Presence and Progression
Golledge et al.
Circulation 2008;118:2382-2392.
FULL TEXT
Emergency ultrasound of the abdominal aorta by UK emergency physicians: a prospective cohort study
Dent et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2007;24:547-549.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Detection, Management, and Prospects for the Medical Treatment of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Powell and Brady
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio. 2004;24:241-245.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Update in Geriatric Medicine
Leipzig
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:1003-1008.
FULL TEXT
Ultrasonographic Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Lederle
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:516-522.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Detection and Management of Small Aortic Aneurysms
Thompson
NEJM 2002;346:1484-1486.
FULL TEXT
Abdominal palpation had moderate sensitivity and specificity for detecting abdominal aortic aneurysm
Taylor
Evid. Based Med. 2001;6:24-24.
FULL TEXT
How Accurate Is Physical Exam in Detecting Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm?
JWatch Gastroenterology 2000;2000:20-20.
FULL TEXT
How Accurate Is Physical Exam in Detecting Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm?
JWatch General 2000;2000:1-1.
FULL TEXT
|
