 |
|
Yield of Repeated Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm After a 4-Year Interval
Frank A. Lederle, MD;
Gary R. Johnson, MS;
Samuel E. Wilson, MD;
Fred N. Littooy, MD;
William C. Krupski, MD;
Dennis Bandyk, MD;
Charles W. Acher, MD;
Edmund P. Chute, MD;
Robert J. Hye, MD;
Ian L. Gordon, MD;
Julie Freischlag, MD;
Allen W. Averbook, MD;
Michel S. Makaroun, MD;
and the Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1117-1121.
Background Little is known about the rate at which new abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) develop or whether screening older men for AAA, if undertaken, should be limited to once in a lifetime or repeated at intervals.
Methods A large population of veterans, aged 50 through 79 years, completed a questionnaire and underwent ultrasound screening for AAA. Of these, 5151 without AAA on the initial ultrasound (defined as infrarenal aortic diameter of 3.0 cm or larger) were selected randomly to be invited for a second ultrasound screening after an interval of 4 years. Local records and national databases were searched to identify deaths and AAA diagnoses made during the study interval in subjects who did not attend the rescreening.
Results Of the 5151 subjects selected for a second screening, 598 (11.6%) had died (none due to AAA), and 20 (0.4%) had an interim diagnosis of AAA. A second screening was performed on 2622 (50.9%), of whom 58 (2.2%; 95% confidence interval, 1.6%-2.8%) had new AAA. Three new AAAs were 4.0 to 4.9 cm, 10 were 3.5 to 3.9 cm, and 45 were 3.0 to 3.4 cm. Independent predictors of new AAA at the second screening included current smoker (odds ratio, 3.09; 95% confidence, 1.74-5.50), coronary artery disease (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.07), and, in a separate model using a composite variable, any atherosclerosis (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-3.35). Adding the interim and rescreening diagnosis rates suggests a 4-year incidence rate of 2.6%. Rescreening only in subjects with infrarenal aortic diameter of 2.5 cm or greater on the initial ultrasound would have missed more than two thirds of the new AAAs.
Conclusions A second screening is of little practical value after 4 years, mainly because the AAAs detected are small. However, the incidence that we observed suggests that a second screening after longer intervals (ie, more than 8 years) may provide yields similar to those seen in initial screening and therefore warrants further study.
From the Departments of Medicine (Dr Lederle) and Surgery (Dr Chute), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minn; Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, West Haven, Conn (Mr Johnson); the Department of Surgery, University of California–Irvine (Dr Wilson); and the Departments of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Hines, Ill (Dr Littooy), Denver, Colo (Dr Krupski), Tampa, Fla (Dr Bandyk), Madison, Wis (Dr Acher), San Diego, Calif (Dr Hye), Long Beach, Calif (Dr Gordon), Milwaukee, Wis (Dr Freischlag), Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Averbook), and Pittsburgh, Pa (Dr Makaroun).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(8):1206-1207.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
A 66-Year-Old Man With an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Review of Screening and Treatment
Schermerhorn
JAMA 2009;302:2015-2022.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Risk Factors for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A 7-Year Prospective Study: The Tromso Study, 1994-2001
Forsdahl et al.
Circulation 2009;119:2202-2208.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms, Increasing Infrarenal Aortic Diameter, and Risk of Total Mortality and Incident Cardiovascular Disease Events: 10-Year Follow-Up Data From the Cardiovascular Health Study
Freiberg et al.
Circulation 2008;117:1010-1017.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Recommendation Statement
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:198-202.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Best-Evidence Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Fleming et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:203-211.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Ultrasonographic Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Lederle
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:516-522.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Screening for aortic aneurysm
Curtis and Lynch
BMJ 2003;326:284-284.
FULL TEXT
The Aneurysm Detection and Management Study Screening Program: Validation Cohort and Final Results
Lederle et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1425-1430.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
