This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (35)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Cardiovascular System  • Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

David E. Powell, MD; Paul A. Tunick, MD; Barry P. Rosenzweig, MD; Robin S. Freedberg, MD; Edward S. Katz, MD; Robert M. Applebaum, MD; John L. Perez, MD; Itzhak Kronzon, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1337-1341.

Background  The outcome of aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis is worse in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Such dysfunction in aortic stenosis may be reversible if caused by afterload mismatch, but not if it is caused by superimposed myocardial infarction.

Methods  From our echocardiography database, 55 patients with severe aortic stenosis (valve area 0.75 cm²) and ejection fractions of 30% or lower who subsequently underwent aortic valve replacement were included. The operative mortality and clinical follow-up were detailed.

Results  There were 10 perioperative deaths (operative mortality, 18%). Twenty (36%) of the 55 patients had a prior myocardial infarction. In the 35 patients without prior myocardial infarction, there was only 1 death (3%). In contrast, 9 of 20 patients with prior myocardial infarction died (mortality rate, 45%; P.001). The factors significantly associated with perioperative death on univariate analysis (functional class, mean aortic gradient, and prior myocardial infarction) were entered into a model for stepwise logistic regression. This multivariate analysis showed that only prior myocardial infarction was independently associated with perioperative death (odds ratio, 14.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-92.1; P=.004).

Conclusions  The risk of aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and severely reduced left ventricular systolic function is extremely high if the patients have had a prior myocardial infarction. This information should be factored into the risk-benefit analysis that is done preoperatively for these patients, and it may preclude operation for some.

From the Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

TandemHeart as a Rescue Therapy for Patients With Critical Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Gregoric et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009;88:1822-1826.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dynamic left ventricular dyssynchrony: a potential cause of no contractile reserve in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis
Lancellotti et al.
Eur J Echocardiogr 2009;10:880-883.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Halkos et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009;88:746-751.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictors of survival after aortic valve replacement in patients with low-flow and high-gradient aortic stenosis
Ding et al.
Eur J Heart Fail 2009;11:897-902.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Anesthetic Considerations
Billings et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2009;108:1453-1462.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Myocardial blood flow in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: differences between true and pseudo-severe aortic stenosis. Results from the multicentre TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study
Burwash et al.
Heart 2008;94:1627-1633.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictors of Outcomes in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Results of the Multicenter TOPAS Study
Clavel et al.
Circulation 2008;118:S234-S242.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Aortic Valve Replacement for Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Operative Risk Stratification and Long-Term Outcome: A European Multicenter Study
Levy et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1466-1472.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Risk Aortic Valve Replacement: Are the Outcomes as Bad as Predicted?
Grossi et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008;85:102-107.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prospects for Percutaneous Valve Therapies
Feldman and Leon
Circulation 2007;116:2866-2877.
FULL TEXT  

Low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival
Monin et al.
Eur Heart J 2007;28:2620-2626.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis: value and limitations of dobutamine stress testing
Bermejo and Yotti
Heart 2007;93:298-302.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Closed heart surgery: Back to the future
Lichtenstein
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2006;131:941-943.
FULL TEXT  

Influence of Preoperative Left Ventricular Contractile Reserve on Postoperative Ejection Fraction in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis
Quere et al.
Circulation 2006;113:1738-1744.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predictors of Low Cardiac Output Syndrome After Isolated Aortic Valve Surgery
Maganti et al.
Circulation 2005;112:I-448-I-452.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Left ventricular mass index as a prognostic factor in patients with severe aortic stenosis and ventricular dysfunction
Fuster et al.
ICVTS 2005;4:260-266.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Operative Risk Stratification and Predictors for Long- Term Outcome in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis * Response
Tunick et al.
Circulation 2004;109 :e33-e33.
FULL TEXT  

Pulmonary autografts in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction
Gauthier et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2003;76:689-693.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Operative Risk Stratification and Predictors for Long-Term Outcome: A Multicenter Study Using Dobutamine Stress Hemodynamics
Monin et al.
Circulation 2003;108:319-324.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Aortic valve replacement in patients with impaired ventricular function
Sharony et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2003;75:1808-1814.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Survival after aortic valve replacement forsevere aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradients and severe left ventricular dysfunction
Pereira et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1356-1363.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT