You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 10, May 28, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal

Comorbidity and Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Imad M. El-Kebbi, MD; David C. Ziemer, MD; Curtiss B. Cook, MD; Christopher D. Miller, MD; Daniel L. Gallina, MD; Lawrence S. Phillips, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1295-1300.

Background  It is commonly believed that good glycemic control is hard to achieve in patients with diabetes mellitus and concurrent chronic illnesses.

Objective  To determine the impact of comorbidity on glycemic control at presentation and subsequent follow-up in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods  We studied 654 consecutive patients who presented to a diabetes clinic in 1997. Comorbidity was rated using the Chronic Disease Score (CDS) index, which is a validated, weighted score that takes into account the patient's age, sex, and classes of medications. Univariate and multivariate linear regressions were used to determine the contribution of age, body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters), diabetes duration, type of therapy, and CDS to initial hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level. A similar analysis was performed for the 169 patients with follow-up HbA1c levels 6 months after presentation.

Results  Patients were 90% African American, and 66% female, with average age of 53 years. Average diabetes duration was 5 years; body mass index, 33; HbA1c level, 8.8%; and CDS, 1121 (range, 232-7953). At presentation, patients with higher CDSs tended to be older and to have a lower HbA1c level, but multivariate linear regression showed that receiving pharmacological therapy, younger age, and having a lower C-peptide level were the only significant contributors to HbA1c level. In the 169 follow-up patients, presenting characteristics were not significantly different from those of the full cohort: average initial HbA1c level was 8.8%; CDS, 1073. Their HbA1c level at 6 months averaged 7.5% and the CDS had no significant impact on their follow-up HbA1c level.

Conclusion  Comorbidity does not appear to limit achievement of good glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.


From the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(10):1355-1356.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Inpatient to Outpatient Transfer of Care in Urban Patients With Diabetes: Patterns and Determinants of Immediate Postdischarge Follow-up
Wheeler et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:447-453.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Case for "Outsourcing" Diabetes Care
Davidson
Diabetes Care 2003;26:1608-1612.
FULL TEXT  

Association of Type and Duration of Diabetes With Erectile Dysfunction in a Large Cohort of Men
Bacon et al.
Diabetes Care 2002;25:1458-1463.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association of Health Literacy With Diabetes Outcomes
Schillinger et al.
JAMA 2002;288:475-482.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.