You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 15, August 13, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (123)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Infectious Diseases, Other
 •Pneumonia
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Monotherapy May Be Suboptimal for Severe Bacteremic Pneumococcal Pneumonia

Grant W. Waterer, MBBS, FRACP; Grant W. Somes, PhD; Richard G. Wunderink, MD, FCCP

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1837-1842.

Background  Although monotherapy for pneumococcal pneumonia is standard, a survival benefit of combination ß-lactam and macrolide therapy has been suggested.

Hypothesis  Initial empirical therapy with a combination of effective antibiotic agents would have a better outcome than a single effective antibiotic agent in patients with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia.

Methods  A review of adult bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia within the Methodist Healthcare System, Memphis, Tenn, between January 1, 1996, and July 31, 2000. Empirical therapy was defined as all antibiotic agents received in the first 24 hours after presentation. On the basis of culture results, empirical therapy was classified as single effective therapy (SET), dual effective therapy (DET), or more than DET (MET). Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II)–based predicted mortality, and Pneumonia Severity Index scores were calculated.

Results  Of the 225 patients identified, 99 were classified as receiving SET, 102 as receiving DET, and 24 as receiving MET. Compared with the other groups, patients who received MET had statistically significantly more severe pneumonia as measured by the Pneumonia Severity Index score (P = .04) and predicted mortality (P = .03). Mortality within the SET group was significantly higher than within the DET group (P = .02, odds ratio, 3.0 [95% confidence intervals, 1.2-7.6]), even when the DET and MET groups (P = .04) were combined. In a logistic regression model including antibiotic therapy and clinical risk factors for mortality, SET remained an independent predictor of mortality with a predicted mortality–adjusted odds ratio for death of 6.4 (95% confidence intervals, 1.9-21.7). All deaths occurred in patients with a Pneumonia Severity Index score higher than 90, and the predicted mortality–adjusted odds ratio for death with SET in this subgroup was 5.5 (95% confidence intervals, 1.7-17.5).

Conclusions  We found that SET is associated with a significantly greater risk of death than DET. Therefore, monotherapy may be suboptimal for patients with severe bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia who have Pneumonia Severity Index scores higher than 90.


From the Department of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Royal Perth Hospital (Dr Waterer); Department of Preventative Medicine, University of Tennessee, Memphis (Dr Somes); and the Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare Foundation, Memphis, Tenn (Dr Wunderink).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Impact of intravenous {beta}-lactam/macrolide versus {beta}-lactam monotherapy on mortality in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia
Tessmer et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2009;63:1025-1033.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Advances in Management
Grossman
ACCP Pulmonary Med Brd Rev 2009;25:359-368.
FULL TEXT  

Severe Pneumonia
Niederman
ACCP Crit Care Med Brd Rev 2009;20:485-506.
FULL TEXT  

Impact of macrolide therapy on mortality for patients with severe sepsis due to pneumonia
Restrepo et al.
Eur Respir J 2009;33:153-159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Radiologic Progression of Pulmonary Infiltrates Predicts a Worse Prognosis in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia Than Bacteremia
Lisboa et al.
Chest 2009;135:165-172.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Respiratory fluoroquinolones for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Vardakas et al.
CMAJ 2008;179:1269-1277.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Review: Novel targets in the management of pneumonia
Diaz et al.
Ther Adv Respir Dis 2008;2:387-400.
ABSTRACT  

Interpretation of the Findings of a Cohort Study of Bacteremic Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Vardakas et al.
Chest 2007;132:1715-1716.
FULL TEXT  

Aminoglycoside treatment and mortality after bacteraemia in patients given appropriate empirical therapy: a Danish hospital-based cohort study
Freundlich et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;60:1115-1123.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of {beta}-Lactam and Macrolide Combination Therapy versus Fluoroquinolone Monotherapy in Hospitalized Veterans Affairs Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Lodise et al.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007;51:3977-3982.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The need for macrolides in hospitalised community-acquired pneumonia: propensity analysis
Paul et al.
Eur Respir J 2007;30:525-531.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antibiotics for Bacteremic Pneumonia: Improved Outcomes With Macrolides but Not Fluoroquinolones
Metersky et al.
Chest 2007;131:466-473.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognostic score systems and community-acquired bacteraemic pneumococcal pneumonia
Spindler and Ortqvist
Eur Respir J 2006;28:816-823.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improved clinical outcomes with utilization of a community-acquired pneumonia guideline.
Dean et al.
Chest 2006;130:794-799.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Implications of COPD in patients admitted to the intensive care unit by community-acquired pneumonia
Rello et al.
Eur Respir J 2006;27:1210-1216.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Novel effects of azithromycin on tight junction proteins in human airway epithelia.
Asgrimsson et al.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006;50:1805-1812.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of initial antibiotic choice on mortality from pneumococcal pneumonia
Aspa et al.
Eur Respir J 2006;27:1010-1019.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mixed community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalised patients.
de Roux et al.
Eur Respir J 2006;27:795-800.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections
Woodhead et al.
Eur Respir J 2005;26:1138-1180.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Potential Mechanisms for Mortality Reduction Associated with Combination Antibiotic Therapy among Severely Ill Patients with Pneumococcal Bacteremia
Schwartz
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005;172:1472a-1473.
FULL TEXT  

Empirical Atypical Coverage for Inpatients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Shefet et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1992-2000.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Understanding variation in quality of antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia: effect of patient, professional and hospital factors
Schouten et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;56:575-582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Macrolides in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Does the Bell Toll for Thee?
Granowitz and Brown
Chest 2005;128:1089-1093.
FULL TEXT  

The Controversy of Combination vs Monotherapy in the Treatment of Hospitalized Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Weiss and Tillotson
Chest 2005;128:940-946.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Monotherapy in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Is It Worthy?
Torres
Chest 2005;128:10-13.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Levofloxacin and Cefotaxime Combined With Ofloxacin for ICU Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia Who Do Not Require Vasopressors
Leroy et al.
Chest 2005;128:172-183.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Combination Antibiotic Therapy Lowers Mortality among Severely Ill Patients with Pneumococcal Bacteremia
Baddour et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2004;170:440-444.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pneumococcal Bacteremia: Lessons Learned, Yet More to Learn
Maki
Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:599-603.
 

Algorithm To Determine Cost Savings of Targeting Antimicrobial Therapy Based on Results of Rapid Diagnostic Testing
Oosterheert et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003;41:4708-4713.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How good is the evidence for the recommended empirical antimicrobial treatment of patients hospitalized because of community-acquired pneumonia? A systematic review
Oosterheert et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2003;52:555-563.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Combination Antibiotic Therapy With Macrolides in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: More Smoke But Is There Any Fire?
Waterer
Chest 2003;123:1328-1329.
FULL TEXT  

Impact of Initial Antibiotic Choice on Clinical Outcomes in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Analysis of a Hospital Claims-Made Database
Brown et al.
Chest 2003;123:1503-1511.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Contribution of Blood Cultures to the Clinical Management of Adult Patients Admitted to the Hospital With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Prospective Observational Study
Campbell et al.
Chest 2003;123:1142-1150.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lack of Synergy of Erythromycin Combined with Penicillin or Cefotaxime against Streptococcus pneumoniae In Vitro
Lin et al.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003;47:1151-1153.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bacteremic Pneumococcal Pneumonia: Is Combination Therapy Indicated?
JWatch Infect. Diseases 2001;2001:2-2.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.