You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 16, September 10, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (47)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

A Randomized Multicenter Trial of Crotalinae Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine) Antivenom for the Treatment for Crotaline Snakebite in the United States

Richard C. Dart, MD, PhD; Steven A. Seifert, MD; Leslie V. Boyer, MD; Richard F. Clark, MD; Edward Hall, MD; Patrick McKinney, MD; Jude McNally, RPh; Craig S. Kitchens, MD; Steven C. Curry, MD; Gregory M. Bogdan, PhD; Suzanne B. Ward, PharmD; R. Stephen Porter, PharmD

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:2030-2036.

Background  Current therapy for crotaline snakebite includes antivenin (Crotalidae) polyvalent, an antivenom with numerous adverse effects. We compared the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens with a new antivenom, Crotalinae polyvalent immune Fab (Fab AV).

Methods  A single dose of Fab AV alone (as-needed [PRN] group) was compared with an initial dose plus repeated treatments during 18 hours (scheduled group) in a multicenter randomized trial. The study included patients with minimal or moderate envenomation by a crotaline snake within the preceding 6 hours, aged 10 years or older, in whom worsening of the envenomation syndrome was observed before Fab AV treatment. After treatment with Fab AV to achieve initial control, patients were randomized to the scheduled or PRN treatment group. Scheduled group patients received additional doses of Fab AV every 6 hours for 3 doses. The PRN group received no planned additional doses of antivenom.

Results  The mean severity score of the 31 patients decreased from 4.35 to 2.39 points (P<.001); there was no difference between scheduled and PRN groups. No patient in the scheduled group received unplanned Fab AV doses, but 8 of 16 patients in the PRN group received unplanned doses (P = .002). Acute reactions occurred in 6 patients (19%), and serum sickness occurred in 6 (23%) of 26 patients who returned for follow-up.

Conclusions  In the first randomized trial of antivenom in the United States, Fab AV effectively terminated venom effects. Since the unplanned use of Fab AV in the PRN group was common, the treatment regimen may require more than 1 initial dose.


From the Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Center, Denver Health Authority, Denver, Colo (Drs Dart and Bogdan); University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver (Dr Dart); Department of Emergency Medicine, Kino Community Hospital, Tucson, Ariz (Dr Seifert); Department of Pediatrics, University of Arizona, Tucson (Dr Boyer); Division of Medical Toxicology, University of California–San Diego Medical Center and the San Diego Division of the California Poison Control System (Dr Clark); Department of Surgery, John D. Archbold Memorial Hospital, Thomasville, Ga (Dr Hall); Department of EmergencyMedicine and the New Mexico Poison Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque (Dr McKinney); Arizona Poison and Drug Information Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson (Mr McNally); Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Hospital, Gainesville, Fla (Dr Kitchens); Department of Medical Toxicology, Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, Phoenix, Ariz, and Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson (Dr Curry); and Therapeutic Antibodies Inc, Nashville, Tenn (Drs Ward and Porter).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(16):2054-2055.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Utilisation of Crotalidae polyvalent immune fab (ovine) for Viperidae envenomations in children
Johnson et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2008;25:793-798.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Venomous Snakebites Worldwide with a Focus on the Australia-Pacific Region: Current Management and Controversies
Cheng and Currie
J Intensive Care Med 2004;19:259-269.
ABSTRACT  

Crotaline Fab Antivenom for Treatment of Children With Rattlesnake Envenomation
Behm et al.
Pediatrics 2003;112:1458-1459.
FULL TEXT  

Crotaline Fab Antivenom for the Treatment of Children With Rattlesnake Envenomation
Offerman et al.
Pediatrics 2002;110:968-971.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bites of Venomous Snakes
Gold et al.
NEJM 2002;347:347-356.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.