This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (27)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Quality of Care, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Survey of Italian Physicians by Professional Setting

Giulio Formoso, MPH, MPharm; Alessandro Liberati, MD; Nicola Magrini, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:2037-2042.

Background  Professional setting might be a key determinant of physicians' attitudes toward practice guidelines, influencing the effect of their implementation. Because no previous surveys have specifically considered this aspect, we evaluated the perceived role and usefulness of guidelines, as well as barriers to and facilitators of their implementation, for hospital, primary care, and nonpracticing clinicians.

Methods  A 43-item self-administered questionnaire was sent to all National Health Service physicians in the province of Modena, Italy (593 primary care physicians, 1049 hospital physicians, and 149 nonpracticing clinicians), and 1199 (66.9%) responded. Opinions and attitudes were assessed using 5-point ordinal scales and an attitude measurement scale. Results were evaluated overall and by professional setting, sex, age, year of graduation, and academic background.

Results  Practice guidelines were generally perceived to be less useful than other sources of medical information (eg, personal experience, conferences, colleagues, articles, the Internet, and textbooks [pharmaceutical representatives were the exception]). Most physicians thought that guidelines are developed for cost-containment reasons and expressed concerns about their limited applicability to individual patients and local settings. Most respondents did not favor the involvement of health professionals other than physicians in guideline development and use and preferred nonmonetary incentives for their implementation. Answers to individual items and attitude scores varied significantly across professional settings. Primary care physicians showed, in general, the least favorable attitudes toward practice guidelines, toward nonphysicians participating in guideline development and use, and toward incentives for guideline users.

Conclusions  Physicians perceived practice guidelines as externally imposed and cost-containment tools rather than as decision-supporting tools. Regularly monitoring attitudes toward practice guidelines can be helpful to evaluate potential barriers to their adoption.

From the Centre for the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Health Care (Drs Formoso, Liberati, and Magrini) and the Department of Hygienistic, Microbiologic, and Biostatistic Sciences, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia (Dr Liberati), Modena, Italy.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Antibiotic stewardship and consumption: findings from a pan-European hospital study
Bruce et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2009;64:853-860.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Introducing a Multifaceted Intervention to Improve the Management of Otitis Media: How Do Pediatricians, Internists, and Family Physicians Respond?
Francis et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2006;21:134-143.
ABSTRACT  

From evidence-based guideline methodology to quality of care standards
Nathwani
J Antimicrob Chemother 2003;51:1103-1107.
FULL TEXT