 |
 |

Processes of Care, Illness Severity, and Outcomes in the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia at Academic Hospitals
Julien Dedier, MD, MPH;
Daniel E. Singer, MD;
Yuchiao Chang, PhD;
Maria Moore, MPH;
Steven J. Atlas, MD, MPH
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:2099-2104.
Background Prompt antibiotic administration, oxygenation measurement, and blood
cultures are generally considered markers of high-quality care in the inpatient
management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, few studies have
examined the relationship between prompt achievement of process-of-care markers
and outcomes for patients with CAP. We examined whether antibiotic administration
within 8 hours of hospital arrival, a blood culture within 24 hours, an oxygenation
measurement within 24 hours, or performing blood cultures before giving antibiotics
was associated with the following: (1) reaching clinical stability within
48 hours of hospital admission, (2) a decreased length of hospital stay, or
(3) fewer inpatient deaths.
Methods A retrospective medical record review identified 1062 eligible patients
discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of CAP between December 1, 1997,
and February 28, 1998, among 38 US academic hospitals. We assessed the independent
relationship between each process marker and the 3 clinical outcomes, controlling
for the Pneumonia Severity Index on admission. We also examined the relationship
of pneumonia severity on admission to process marker achievement and clinical
outcomes.
Results Overall, there was no consistent or statistically significant relationship
between achieving process markers and better clinical outcomes (P>.40 for all). We did observe that performing blood cultures within
24 hours was related to not achieving clinical stability within 48 hours (odds
ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-2.33). However, this finding likely
reflects residual confounding by severity of illness, since increasing pneumonia
severity on admission was associated with blood culture performance (P = .009) and with shorter times to antibiotic administration
(P = .04).
Conclusions Achieving process-of-care markers was not associated with improved outcomes,
but was related to the severity of pneumonia as assessed on admission. Our
results highlight the difficulty in demonstrating a link between process-of-care
markers and outcomes in observational studies of CAP. Randomized studies are
needed to objectively evaluate the impact of process-of-care markers on CAP
outcomes.
From the Section of General Internal Medicine Research Unit, Department
of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass (Dr Dedier); the Clinical
Epidemiology Unit, General Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts
General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Drs Singer, Chang, and Atlas);
and the University HealthSystem Consortium, Oak Brook, Ill (Ms Moore).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Public Reporting of Antibiotic Timing in Patients with Pneumonia: Lessons from a Flawed Performance Measure
Wachter et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:29-32.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Reducing door-to-antibiotic time in community-acquired pneumonia: controlled before-and-after evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis
Barlow et al.
Thorax 2007;62:67-74.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effect of Increasing the Intensity of Implementing Pneumonia Guidelines: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Yealy et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:881-894.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Understanding variation in quality of antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia: effect of patient, professional and hospital factors
Schouten et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;56:575-582.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The CMS Blood Cultures for CAP Program: The Architects Speak Out
JWatch Emergency Med. 2005;2005:1-1.
FULL TEXT
Comparison of Quality of Care for Patients in the Veterans Health Administration and Patients in a National Sample
Asch et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;141:938-945.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Limited Impact of a Multicenter Intervention To Improve the Quality and Efficiency of Pneumonia Care
Halm et al.
Chest 2004;126:100-107.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Timing of Antibiotic Administration and Outcomes for Medicare Patients Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Houck et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:637-644.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Results of the first 100 accreditation procedures in France
Daucourt and Michel
Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15:463-471.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Shoot, Ready, Aim: Pneumonia Care Quality and Costs in a Community Hospital
Milo et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2003;18:214-219.
ABSTRACT
Blood Cultures in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Are We Ready To Quit?
Luna
Chest 2003;123:977-978.
FULL TEXT
Dilatory Standards Are Below the Level of Care
Sanders et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:844-845.
FULL TEXT
Pneumonia Treatment Process and Quality
Houck et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:843-844.
FULL TEXT
|