You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 17, September 24, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (36)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Infectious Diseases, Other
 •Pneumonia
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Processes of Care, Illness Severity, and Outcomes in the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia at Academic Hospitals

Julien Dedier, MD, MPH; Daniel E. Singer, MD; Yuchiao Chang, PhD; Maria Moore, MPH; Steven J. Atlas, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:2099-2104.

Background  Prompt antibiotic administration, oxygenation measurement, and blood cultures are generally considered markers of high-quality care in the inpatient management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, few studies have examined the relationship between prompt achievement of process-of-care markers and outcomes for patients with CAP. We examined whether antibiotic administration within 8 hours of hospital arrival, a blood culture within 24 hours, an oxygenation measurement within 24 hours, or performing blood cultures before giving antibiotics was associated with the following: (1) reaching clinical stability within 48 hours of hospital admission, (2) a decreased length of hospital stay, or (3) fewer inpatient deaths.

Methods  A retrospective medical record review identified 1062 eligible patients discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of CAP between December 1, 1997, and February 28, 1998, among 38 US academic hospitals. We assessed the independent relationship between each process marker and the 3 clinical outcomes, controlling for the Pneumonia Severity Index on admission. We also examined the relationship of pneumonia severity on admission to process marker achievement and clinical outcomes.

Results  Overall, there was no consistent or statistically significant relationship between achieving process markers and better clinical outcomes (P>.40 for all). We did observe that performing blood cultures within 24 hours was related to not achieving clinical stability within 48 hours (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-2.33). However, this finding likely reflects residual confounding by severity of illness, since increasing pneumonia severity on admission was associated with blood culture performance (P = .009) and with shorter times to antibiotic administration (P = .04).

Conclusions  Achieving process-of-care markers was not associated with improved outcomes, but was related to the severity of pneumonia as assessed on admission. Our results highlight the difficulty in demonstrating a link between process-of-care markers and outcomes in observational studies of CAP. Randomized studies are needed to objectively evaluate the impact of process-of-care markers on CAP outcomes.


From the Section of General Internal Medicine Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass (Dr Dedier); the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, General Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Drs Singer, Chang, and Atlas); and the University HealthSystem Consortium, Oak Brook, Ill (Ms Moore).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Public Reporting of Antibiotic Timing in Patients with Pneumonia: Lessons from a Flawed Performance Measure
Wachter et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;149:29-32.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reducing door-to-antibiotic time in community-acquired pneumonia: controlled before-and-after evaluation and cost-effectiveness analysis
Barlow et al.
Thorax 2007;62:67-74.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Increasing the Intensity of Implementing Pneumonia Guidelines: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Yealy et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:881-894.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Understanding variation in quality of antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia: effect of patient, professional and hospital factors
Schouten et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;56:575-582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The CMS Blood Cultures for CAP Program: The Architects Speak Out
JWatch Emergency Med. 2005;2005:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Quality of Care for Patients in the Veterans Health Administration and Patients in a National Sample
Asch et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;141:938-945.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Limited Impact of a Multicenter Intervention To Improve the Quality and Efficiency of Pneumonia Care
Halm et al.
Chest 2004;126:100-107.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Timing of Antibiotic Administration and Outcomes for Medicare Patients Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Houck et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:637-644.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Results of the first 100 accreditation procedures in France
Daucourt and Michel
Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15:463-471.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Shoot, Ready, Aim: Pneumonia Care Quality and Costs in a Community Hospital
Milo et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2003;18:214-219.
ABSTRACT  

Blood Cultures in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Are We Ready To Quit?
Luna
Chest 2003;123:977-978.
FULL TEXT  

Dilatory Standards Are Below the Level of Care
Sanders et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:844-845.
FULL TEXT  

Pneumonia Treatment Process and Quality
Houck et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:843-844.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.