You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 17, September 24, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Noninvasive Helicobacter pylori Testing for the "Test-and-Treat" Strategy

A Decision Analysis to Assess the Effect of Past Infection on Test Choice

William D. Chey, MD, FACP, FACG; A. Mark Fendrick, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:2129-2132.

Background  Clinical guidelines support a noninvasive Helicobacter pylori "test-and-treat" strategy for individuals with uncomplicated dyspepsia. However, consensus is lacking regarding the preferred noninvasive testing method.

Objective  To use decision analytic modeling to estimate the clinical and economic outcomes associated with noninvasive tests designed to detect either H pylori antibody or active H pylori infection.

Design  Decision analytic model.

Patients  A simulated patient cohort with uncomplicated dyspepsia.

Interventions  The simulated dyspepsia cohort underwent antibody testing or testing to detect active H pylori infection (active testing). Individuals testing positive received eradication therapy.

Main Outcome Measures  Appropriate and inappropriate treatment prescribed, cost per patient treated, incremental cost per unnecessary treatment avoided.

Results  Active testing led to a substantial reduction in unnecessary treatment for patients without active infection (antibody, 23.7; active, 1.4 per 100 patients) at an incremental cost of $37 per patient. The clinical advantage and cost-effectiveness of active testing was enhanced as the percentage of individuals with a positive antibody test result from past, but not current, infection increased.

Conclusions  Active testing for H pylori infection significantly decreases the inappropriate use of antimicrobial therapy when compared with antibody testing. The advantages of active testing should be enhanced as the widespread use of antimicrobial agents increases the proportion of patients with antibody to H pylori, but without active infection.


From the Divisions of Gastroenterology (Dr Chey) and General Medicine (Dr Fendrick), and the Consortium for Health Outcomes, Innovation, and Cost-effectiveness Studies (CHOICES) (Dr Fendrick), University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(17):2155-2156.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht III Consensus Report
Malfertheiner et al.
Gut 2007;56:772-781.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.