This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (22)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A National Prospective Cohort Study of Physicians

Marcia Cruz-Correa, MD; Cary P. Gross, MD; Marcia Irene Canto, MD, MHS; Michael Cabana, MD, MPH; Richard E. Sampliner, MD; J. Patrick Waring, MD; Corlina McNeil-Solis, BS; Neil R. Powe, MD, MPH, MBA

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:2588-2595.

Background  Surveillance of patients with Barrett esophagus (BE) is recommended to detect dysplasia and early cancer. In 1998, practice guidelines for the surveillance of patients with BE were developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG). Our objective is to assess physicians' awareness of agreement with and adherence to these guidelines.

Methods  A national prospective cohort study of practicing gastroenterologists who completed a self-administered questionnaire containing case studies prior to the release of the guidelines and another survey 18 months later. Analysis of adherence to the guidelines was done using the McNemar ² test.

Results  Of the 154 gastroenterologists (66%) who responded to the follow-up survey, more than half (55%) were aware of the guidelines, and members of the ACG were more likely to know of their existence than nonmembers (61% vs 38%; P = .01). Overall, about 27% of physicians reported practicing in accordance with the guidelines at baseline; adherence increased modestly to 38% in the 18-month follow-up (P = .04) and was inversely related to fee-for-service reimbursement. Awareness was not associated with an increased likelihood of adherence, but agreement with the guidelines was strongly correlated with adherence (P<.001). The most frequent reasons for disagreement were concerns about liability, cancer risk, and inadequate evidence.

Conclusions  Awareness of the guidelines published by the ACG was low. Guideline awareness did not predict adherence. Improvement in guideline adherence will require steps beyond mere dissemination and promotion. Addressing disagreements about liability, disease risk, and scientific evidence as well as restructuring payment incentives may help achieve optimal practice.

From the Division of Gastroenterology-Hepatology (Drs Cruz-Correa and Canto and Ms McNeil-Solis) and the Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research (Dr Powe), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (Dr Gross); the Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Dr Cabana); the Division of Gastroenterology, Tucson Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson (Dr Sampliner); and the Division of Gastroenterology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (Dr Waring).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Introducing a Multifaceted Intervention to Improve the Management of Otitis Media: How Do Pediatricians, Internists, and Family Physicians Respond?
Francis et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2006;21:134-143.
ABSTRACT  

Are Physicians Doing Too Much Colonoscopy? A National Survey of Colorectal Surveillance after Polypectomy
Mysliwiec et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;141:264-271.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT