You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 3, February 12, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (58)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Patient-Physician Relationship, Other
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Accuracy of Primary Care and Hospital-Based Physicians' Predictions of Elderly Outpatients' Treatment Preferences With and Without Advance Directives

Kristen M. Coppola, PhD; Peter H. Ditto, PhD; Joseph H. Danks, PhD; William D. Smucker, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:431-440.

Background  Past research has documented that primary care physicians and family members are often inaccurate when making substituted judgments for patients without advance directives (ADs). This study compared the accuracy of substituted judgments made by primary care physicians, hospital-based physicians, and family surrogates on behalf of elderly outpatients and examined the effectiveness of ADs in improving the accuracy of these judgments.

Participants and Methods  Participants were 24 primary care physicians of 82 elderly outpatients, 17 emergency and critical care physicians who had no prior experience with the patients, and a baseline comparison group of family surrogates. The primary outcome was accuracy of physicians' predictions of patients' preferences for 4 life-sustaining treatments in 9 hypothetical illness scenarios. Physicians made substituted judgments after being provided with no patient AD, patient's value-based AD, or patient's scenario-based AD.

Results  Family surrogates' judgments were more accurate than physicians'. Hospital-based physicians making predictions without ADs had the lowest accuracy. Primary care physicians' accuracy was not improved by either AD. Accuracy and confidence in predictions of hospital-based physicians was significantly improved for some scenarios using a scenario-based AD.

Conclusions  Although ADs do not improve the accuracy of substituted judgments for primary care physicians or family surrogates, they increase the accuracy of hospital-based physicians. Primary care physicians are withdrawing from hospital-based care in growing numbers, and emergency medicine and critical care specialists most often are involved in decisions about whether to begin life-sustaining treatments. If ADs can help these physicians better understand patients' preferences, patient autonomy more likely will be preserved when patients become incapacitated.


From the Department of Psychology, Monmouth University, West Long Branch, NJ (Dr Coppola); Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine (Dr Ditto); Department of Psychology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio (Dr Danks); and Department of Family Practice, Summa Health System, Akron, Ohio (Dr Smucker).

Corresponding author and reprints: Kristen M. Coppola, PhD, Department of Psychology, Monmouth University, West Long Branch, NJ 07764 (e-mail: kcoppola{at}monmouth.edu) or Peter H. Ditto, PhD, Psychology and Social Behavior, 3340 Social Ecology II, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-7085 (e-mail: phditto{at}uci.edu).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Advance Directives as Acts of Communication: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Peter H. Ditto, Joseph H. Danks, William D. Smucker, Jamila Bookwala, Kristen M. Coppola, Rebecca Dresser, Angela Fagerlin, R. Mitchell Gready, Renate M. Houts, Lisa K. Lockhart, and Stephen Zyzanski
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(3):421-430.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Impact of Late-Life Parental Death on Adult Sibling Relationships: Do Parents' Advance Directives Help or Hurt?
Khodyakov and Carr
Research on Aging 2009;31:495-519.
ABSTRACT  

How Much Do Patients' Preferences Contribute To Resource Use?
Anthony et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:864-873.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Advance Directives and Proxies' Predictions About Patients' Treatment Preferences
Barrio-Cantalejo et al.
Nurs Ethics 2009;16:93-109.
ABSTRACT  

Uncovering Beliefs and Barriers: Staff Attitudes Related to Advance Directives
Bergman-Evans et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2008;25:347-353.
ABSTRACT  

Role of advance directives in palliative care units: a prospective study
Pautex et al.
Palliat Med 2008;22:835-841.
ABSTRACT  

Content of Advance Directives for Individuals With Advanced Dementia
Triplett et al.
J Aging Health 2008;20:583-596.
ABSTRACT  

Evidence for Improving Palliative Care at the End of Life: A Systematic Review
Lorenz et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:147-159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical Decision Making for Patients Without Surrogates
Varma and Wendler
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1711-1715.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Default Effect in End-of-Life Medical Treatment Preferences
Kressel and Chapman
Med Decis Making 2007;27:299-310.
ABSTRACT  

End-of-Life Health Care Planning Among Young-Old Adults: An Assessment of Psychosocial Influences
Carr and Khodyakov
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Science 2007;62:S135-S141.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The State of Advance Care Planning: One Decade After SUPPORT
Collins et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2006;23:378-384.
ABSTRACT  

Improvements in Advance Care Planning in the Veterans Affairs System: Results of a Multifaceted Intervention
Pearlman et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:667-674.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Projection Bias in Medical Decision Making
Loewenstein
Med Decis Making 2005;25:96-105.
 

National questionnaire survey on what influences doctors' decisions about admission to intensive care
Escher et al.
BMJ 2004;329:425.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Good and Bad Dying From the Perspective of Terminally Ill Men
Vig and Pearlman
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:977-981.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethical Issues in Geriatrics: A Guide for Clinicians
Mueller et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:554-562.
ABSTRACT  

Meaning and Agency in Discussing End-of-Life Care: A Study of Elderly Veterans' Values and Interpretations
Young et al.
Qual Health Res 2003;13:1039-1062.
ABSTRACT  

The Value of Disease Severity in Predicting Patient Readiness to Address End-of-Life Issues
Pfeifer et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:609-612.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patient, Physician, and Family Member Understanding of Living Wills
Upadya et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002;166:1430-1435.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of Patient Preferences: Integrating Treatments and Outcomes
Fried et al.
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Science 2002;57:S348-354.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Communication Near the End of Life
HICKMAN
American Behavioral Scientist 2002;46:252-267.
ABSTRACT  

The Use of Advance Directives in End-of-life Decision Making: Problems and Possibilities
FAGERLIN et al.
American Behavioral Scientist 2002;46:268-283.
ABSTRACT  

"Choice" in End-of-Life Decision Making: Researching Fact or Fiction?
Drought and Koenig
Gerontologist 2002;42:114-128.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluating End-of-Life Care from the Perspective of the Patient's Family
Larson and Larson
Eval Health Prof 2002;25:143-151.
ABSTRACT  

Advance Directives as Acts of Communication: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Ditto et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:421-430.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.