You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 4, February 26, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Abdominal Cross-sectional Imaging for Inpatients With Abnormal Liver Function Test Results

Yield and Usefulness

Jeffrey M. Rothschild, MD, MPH; Ramin Khorasani, MDCM, FRCPC; Stuart G. Silverman, MD; Richard W. Hanson; Julie M. Fiskio; David W. Bates, MD, MSc

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:583-588.

Background  Abdominal cross-sectional imaging is often performed to evaluate abnormal liver function test (LFT) results in hospitalized patients. However, few data are available regarding the yield and usefulness of imaging inpatients for the indication of abnormal LFT results, the process of requesting abdominal imaging studies, or the response to their findings.

Methods  We retrospectively reviewed abdominal imaging scans that were obtained during a 27-month period. We matched the imaging studies done with the indication of abnormal LFT results; all scans were requested using computerized physician order entry. Reports were coded for interpretation and associated process step results. To determine the usefulness of the imaging studies, a random sample of patient charts with positively coded imaging studies were reviewed. Imaging examinations were considered useful if they provided new diagnostic information and/or changed subsequent patient care.

Results  Of 6494 abdominal imaging studies, 856 were performed for the indication of abnormal LFT results and matched to both image reports and laboratory results. Report coding judged 37% of interpretations as clinically significant, including 27% with "positive" (abnormal results and explain the abnormal LFT results) examinations. Among the positive examinations, the most common diagnoses were biliary obstruction (25%), cholecystitis (21%), malignancy (20%), and cirrhosis (14%). Positively coded reports provided new clinical information in 63% of these studies and changed patient care in 42% of cases. Process measures assessed provision of additional information to and from radiologists (69% and 8%, respectively) and the frequency with which the findings of current abdominal imaging studies were compared with those of prior studies (59%).

Conclusion  Abdominal cross-sectional imaging studies performed on inpatients with abnormal LFT results had a high diagnostic yield and frequently changed patient care.


From the Division of General Medicine (Drs Rothschild and Bates) and the Department of Radiology (Drs Khorasani and Silverman and Mr Hanson), Brigham and Women's Hospital, the Departments of Medicine (Drs Rothschild and Bates) and Radiology (Drs Khorasani and Silverman), Harvard Medical School, and Clinical Information Systems, Partners Healthcare System (Ms Fiskio), Boston Mass.

Corresponding author: Jeffrey M. Rothschild, MD, MPH, Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Argatroban Therapy in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia With Hepatic Dysfunction
Levine et al.
Chest 2006;129:1167-1175.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Inpatient Radiology Utilization: Trends over the Past Decade
Matin et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006;186:7-11.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computerized Physician Order Entry and Decision Support: Improving the Quality of Care
Khorasani
RadioGraphics 2001;21:1015-1018.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.