You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 5, March 12, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (51)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Ethics
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

How Much Information About Adverse Effects of Medication Do Patients Want From Physicians?

Dewey K. Ziegler, MD; Michael C. Mosier, PhD; Maritza Buenaver, BS; Kola Okuyemi, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:706-713.

Background  Little information exists concerning the amount of information patients expect from physicians as to the risk for an adverse medication reaction. The present study was designed to determine such opinions in a population sample; to correlate results with sex, age, educational level, and previous experience with adverse effects; and to determine whether patients believe physicians should use discretion in the amount of such information given.

Methods  Two thousand five hundred sequential adults visiting outpatient clinics filled out a 12-item questionnaire. Percentages of subjects desiring information about varying degrees of risk and those believing physicians should and should not use discretion in the amount of such information provided were recorded. Results were correlated with demographic variables and previous experience of adverse effects.

Results  Among the respondents, 76.2% desired to be told of all possible adverse effects; 13.3% only if an adverse effect occurred 1 in 100 000 times; and 10.2% only if such occurrence was 1 in 100 times; 0.4% were not interested in any information. (Percentages have been rounded and do not total 100.) Percentages were closely similar to those for the same question that restricted opinion to serious adverse effects. Desire for maximum information was significantly correlated with lower educational level (P<.00l) and previous frequent experience with adverse effects (P<.001) and in older women (P<.001). The opinion that the physician should give the same information to all patients was given by 67.6% of the sample, and 73.4% opined that physicians were never justified in withholding any information.

Conclusion  Most individuals desire from physicians all information concerning possible adverse effects of prescribed medication and do not favor physician discretion in these decisions.


From the Departments of Neurology (Dr Ziegler), Preventive Medicine (Dr Mosier), and Family Medicine (Dr Okuyemi), University of Kansas Medical Center, and the University of Kansas Medical School (Ms Buenaver), Kansas City.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Communications of Adverse Effects of Medications: Physician Challenges and Informatics Readiness
Amit Kumar Ghosh and Dewey K. Ziegler
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(19):2387.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(5):779-780.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Under what conditions do patients want to be informed about their risk of a complication? A vignette study
Janssen et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2009;35:276-282.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Informed Consent in Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Caspi et al.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2009;0:nep032v1-nep032.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomised controlled trial of the effect of standard and detailed risk disclosure prior to bronchoscopy on peri-procedure anxiety and satisfaction
Uzbeck et al.
Thorax 2009;64:224-227.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health advisories: when good intentions go bad
Mamdani
CMAJ 2008;178:1025-1026.
FULL TEXT  

Patient-Physician Fit: An Exploratory Study of a Multidimensional Instrument
Schwartz et al.
Med Decis Making 2006;26:122-133.
ABSTRACT  

Patient-Reported Medication Symptoms in Primary Care
Weingart et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:234-240.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Safety Reporting in Randomized Trials of Mental Health Interventions
Papanikolaou et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2004;161:1692-1697.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Perceptions of the risks and benefits of medicines in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other painful musculoskeletal conditions
Berry et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004;43:901-905.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethical problems arising in evidence based complementary and alternative medicine
Ernst et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2004;30:156-159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What do patients really want to know?
Schattner
QJM 2002;95:135-136.
FULL TEXT  

Communications of Adverse Effects of Medications: Physician Challenges and Informatics Readiness
Ghosh and Ziegler
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2387-2387.
FULL TEXT  

Patients Want to Know More
JWatch Psychiatry 2001;2001:16-16.
FULL TEXT  

Patients Want to Know More
JWatch General 2001;2001:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.