You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 5, March 12, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (44)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Are Aneroid Sphygmomanometers Accurate in Hospital and Clinic Settings?

Vincent J. Canzanello, MD; Patricia L. Jensen, RN; Gary L. Schwartz, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:729-731.

Background  The aneroid sphygmomanometer is commonly used for the indirect measurement of blood pressure despite significant concerns about its accuracy. Although the mercury sphygmomanometer is highly accurate, there are concerns about the environmental toxicity of mercury. In response to various external pressures to become essentially mercury free, the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, has replaced many mercury sphygmomanometers with aneroid devices. Since 1993, a maintenance protocol has been in place to ensure proper function and accuracy of these devices.

Methods  We assessed the accuracy of 283 aneroid devices using as the reference standard a digital pressure and vacuum meter that was calibrated using a mercury sphygmomanometer.

Results  The mean ± SD values from the aneroid device in millimeters of mercury at each reference point (at 20–mm Hg intervals from 60 to 240 mm Hg defined by the reference device) were 59.9 ± 1.9 at 60; 79.9 ± 1.9 at 80; 100.0 ± 1.8 at 100; 120.3 ± 1.8 at 120; 140.7 ± 1.4 at 140; 160.7 ± 1.7 at 160; 180.9 ± 1.3 at 180; 200.7 ± 5.0 at 200; 221.0 ± 1.3 at 220; and 240.8 ± 1.6 at 240 (r = 0.99; P<.001). The values from the aneroid device underestimated those of the reference device by a mean of 0.5 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.7). Virtually 100% of the values from the aneroid device were within the 4–mm Hg range recommended by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.

Conclusion  Aneroid sphygmomanometers provide accurate pressure measurements when a proper maintenance protocol is followed.


From the Division of Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(5):779-780.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinical Stress Testing in the Pediatric Age Group: A Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Committee on Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Youth
Paridon et al.
Circulation 2006;113:1905-1920.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals: Part 1: Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans: A Statement for Professionals From the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research
Pickering et al.
Circulation 2005;111:697-716.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improved Blood Pressure Control With a Physician-Nurse Team and Home Blood Pressure Measurement
Canzanello et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:31-36.
ABSTRACT  

Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals: Part 1: Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans: A Statement for Professionals From the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research
Pickering et al.
Hypertension 2005;45:142-161.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Fourth Report on the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents
National High Blood Pressure Education Program Wor
Pediatrics 2004;114:555-576.
FULL TEXT  

Measuring blood pressure: pitfalls and recommendations
Tholl et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:766-770.
FULL TEXT  

Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure
Chobanian et al.
Hypertension 2003;42:1206-1252.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Blood Pressure Evaluation among Older Living Kidney Donors
Textor et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2003;14:2159-2167.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring Blood Pressure Accurately: New and Persistent Challenges
Jones et al.
JAMA 2003;289:1027-1030.
FULL TEXT  

Electronic Sphygmomanometers: Are They a Source of Mercury in Hospitals?
Colquitt and Jones
Hypertension 2002;39 :e21-e21.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.