You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 6, March 26, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (63)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Electron-Beam Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease

A Meta-analysis

Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, MD, MPH; Sanjay Saint, MD, MPH; Lawrence F. Bielak, DDS, MPH; Seema S. Sonnad, PhD; Patricia A. Peyser, PhD; Melvyn Rubenfire, MD; A. Mark Fendrick, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:833-838.

Background  Electron-beam computed tomography (EBCT) is a new, noninvasive method of detecting coronary artery calcification that is being increasingly advocated as a diagnostic test for coronary artery disease (CAD). Before its clinical use is justified, however, the overall accuracy of EBCT must be better defined.

Objective  To estimate the accuracy of EBCT in diagnosing obstructive CAD.

Data Sources  English-language studies from January 1, 1979, through Feburary 29, 2000, were retrieved using MEDLINE and Current Contents databases, bibliographies, and expert consultation.

Study Selection  We included a study if it (1) used EBCT as a diagnostic test; (2) reported cases in absolute numbers of true-positive, false-positive, true-negative, and false-negative results; and (3) used coronary angiography as the reference standard for diagnosing obstructive CAD (defined as >=50% diameter stenosis).

Data Extraction  Data were extracted from the included articles by 2 independent reviewers.

Data Synthesis  Weighted pooled analysis and summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to determine sensitivity and specificity rates. Results from 9 studies with 1662 subjects were included. Pooled sensitivity for EBCT was 92.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.7%-94.0%) and pooled specificity was 51.2% (95% CI, 47.5%-54.9%). Maximum joint sensitivity and specificity for EBCT from its summary ROC curve was 75%. As the threshold for defining an abnormal test varied, sensitivity and specificity changed. For a threshold that resulted in a sensitivity of 90%, specificity was 54%; when sensitivity was 80%, specificity rose to 71%.

Conclusion  The performance of EBCT as a diagnostic test for obstructive CAD is reasonable based on sensitivity and specificity rates from its summary ROC curve.


From the Divisions of General Medicine (Drs Nallamothu, Saint, and Fendrick) and Cardiology (Drs Nallamothu and Rubenfire), Department of Internal Medicine, the Department of Surgery (Dr Sonnad), and the Consortium for Health Outcomes, Innovation, and Cost-Effectiveness Studies (Drs Sonnad and Fendrick), University of Michigan Medical School, and the Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health (Drs Bielak and Peyser), Ann Arbor.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Cost-effectiveness of Electron-Beam Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease
Tsung O. Cheng
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(21):2624.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Electron-Beam Computed Tomography as a Population Screening Tool
Michael Kelleher, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Sanjay Saint, Melvyn Rubenfire, and A. Mark Fendrick
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(21):2624-2625.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(6):897.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The ageing athlete: screening prior to vigorous exertion in asymptomatic adults without known cardiovascular disease
Freeman et al.
Br. J. Sports. Med. 2009;43:696-701.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Novel cardiovascular risk factors do not completely explain the higher prevalence of peripheral arterial disease among African Americans. The San Diego Population Study.
Ix et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:2347-2354.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association of Mild to Moderate Kidney Dysfunction and Coronary Calcification
Ix et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008;19:579-585.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relation of Retinopathy to Coronary Artery Calcification: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Wong et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:51-58.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

New Technology for Noninvasive Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease
Di Carli and Hachamovitch
Circulation 2007;115:1464-1480.
FULL TEXT  

Noninvasive Screening for Coronary Artery Disease With Computed Tomography Is Useful
Clouse et al.
Circulation 2006;113:125-146.
FULL TEXT  

Effect of Lipid Modification on Progression of Coronary Calcification
McCullough
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2005;16:S115-S119.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Urine Albumin Excretion and Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease
Kramer et al.
Hypertension 2005;46:38-43.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of Whole-Body CT Screening
Beinfeld et al.
Radiology 2005;234:415-422.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association between Chronic Kidney Disease and Coronary Artery Calcification: The Dallas Heart Study
Kramer et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2005;16:507-513.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association of Traditional and Nontraditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Coronary Artery Calcification
Folsom et al.
ANGIOLOGY 2004;55:613-623.
ABSTRACT  

Association of Traditional and Nontraditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Coronary Artery Calcification
Folsom et al.
ANGIOLOGY 2004;55:613-623.
ABSTRACT  

Molecular, Endocrine, and Genetic Mechanisms of Arterial Calcification
Doherty et al.
Endocr. Rev. 2004;25:629-672.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Selecting Asymptomatic Patients for Coronary Computed Tomography or Electrocardiographic Exercise Testing
Greenland and Gaziano
NEJM 2003;349:465-473.
FULL TEXT  

Radiation Exposure during Cardiac CT: Effective Doses at Multi-Detector Row CT and Electron-Beam CT
Hunold et al.
Radiology 2003;226:145-152.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is calcium the clue?
Daly et al.
Eur Heart J 2002;23:1562-1566.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of Electron-Beam Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease
Cheng
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2624-2624.
FULL TEXT  

Electron-Beam Computed Tomography as a Population Screening Tool
Kelleher et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2624-2625.
FULL TEXT  

Continuous Probabilistic Prediction of Angiographically Significant Coronary Artery Disease Using Electron Beam Tomography
Budoff et al.
Circulation 2002;105:1791-1796.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.