You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 6, March 26, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Immunologic Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance and Exposure to Breast Implants

Elizabeth W. Karlson, MD; Milenko Tanasijevic, MD; Susan E. Hankinson, ScD; Matthew H. Liang, MD, MPH; Graham A. Colditz, MD, DrPH; Frank E. Speizer, MD; Peter H. Schur, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:864-867.

Background  Animal studies and uncontrolled case series in humans have suggested a possible association between breast implant exposure and monoclonal gammopathy.

Objective  To assess whether there is an increased risk of monoclonal gammopathy in women with silicone breast implants, we conducted a retrospective study of women exposed to breast implants and matched nonexposed women nested within a prospective cohort study (the Nurses' Health Study).

Methods  We used serum protein electrophoresis and immunoglobulin subtype by immunofixation to test 288 women exposed to breast implants and 288 age-matched, nonexposed women who previously had provided a blood sample (1989-1990) for monoclonal proteins.

Results  Among the women exposed to breast implants, 5 had monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) compared with 4 women among those not exposed (odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-6.39). The distribution of isotypes was similar across exposure groups. The exposed women with MGUS tended to be older than the nonexposed women (mean age, 60.4 years vs 52.5 years, respectively; P = .03). None of the 9 women with MGUS had reported multiple myeloma or other hematologic malignancies up through 1996.

Conclusions  We find little evidence to support a substantial increased risk of MGUS in women exposed to breast implants. Larger studies are needed to determine if a more modest relationship exists.


From the Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy (Dr Schur), Robert B. Brigham Multipurpose Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases Center (Drs Karlson and Liang), Channing Laboratory (Drs Hankinson, Colditz, and Speizer), and the Department of Pathology (Dr Tanasijevic), Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School (Drs Karlson, Tanasijevic, Hankinson, Liang, Colditz, Speizer, and Schur), Boston, Mass.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(6):897.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Plasma C Peptide Level and Cognitive Function Among Older Women Without Diabetes Mellitus
Okereke et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1651-1656.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.