You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 6, March 26, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (30)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Treatment Adherence
 •Adherence
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Adverse Drug Effects, Compliance, and Initial Doses of Antihypertensive Drugs Recommended by the Joint National Committee vs the Physicians' Desk Reference

Jay S. Cohen, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:880-885.

Background  Compliance problems are common causes of the inadequate treatment of hypertension, with 16% to 50% of patients quitting treatment within 1 year. Dose-related adverse drug events (ADEs) frequently cause compliance problems, and many ADEs occur with the initial doses of antihypertensive drugs. Thus, it is an established tenet to initiate antihypertensive therapy at low doses to avoid ADEs that diminish patients' quality of life and reduce compliance. However, what are the lowest effective doses of antihypertensive drugs?

Objective  To compare the initial doses recommended in the Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR) with those recommended by the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on the Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI).

Methods  Review of the latest JNC VI report (1997) and the 1999 and 2000 editions of the PDR and the medical literature.

Results  The JNC VI recommends substantially lower initial doses for 23 (58%) of 40 drugs, compared with the PDR. In addition, for 37 (82%) of 45 drugs, PDR guidelines do not suggest lower initial doses for old or frail patients than for younger adults.

Conclusions  Although the PDR is the drug reference most used by physicians, it does not reflect the lowest initial doses that are recommended by the JNC VI for many of the most prescribed antihypertensive drugs. Because avoidance of ADEs is essential to maintaining compliance with antihypertensive therapy, and because many antihypertensive ADEs are dose related, physicians must know the very lowest, effective, least ADE-prone doses. Patients and physicians would benefit by establishing mechanisms to make this information readily available to all practicing physicians.


From the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California– San Diego, La Jolla.


RELATED LETTERS

PDR Provides Latest Food and Drug Administration–Approved Dosage Guidelines
Mukesh Mehta
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(21):2622.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cohen vs PDR
Russell A. Rohde
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(21):2622-2623.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Start Low, Go Slow, Is Not Always Best
Daniel Reinharth and Jay S. Cohen
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(21):2623.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Persistence with Treatment in Newly Treated Middle-Aged Patients with Essential Hypertension
Perreault et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2005;39:1401-1408.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antidepressants: An Avoidable and Solvable Controversy
Cohen
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2004;38:1743-1746.
FULL TEXT  

Primary Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Lifestyle Intervention: Implications for Health Policy
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Primary
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:951-957.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Adherence and Reducing Medication Discrepancies in Patients with Diabetes
Grant et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2003;37:962-969.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Addressing Dosing Frequency in Diabetes: A Simple Approach to Improving Adherence to Therapy and Clinical Outcomes
Morris
The Diabetes Educator 2003;29:440-453.
 

Why Aren't Lower, Effective, OTC Doses Available Earlier by Prescription?
Cohen
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2003;37:136-142.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Timing of New Black Box Warnings and Withdrawals for Prescription Medications
Lasser et al.
JAMA 2002;287:2215-2220.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

PDR Provides Latest Food and Drug Administration-Approved Dosage Guidelines
Mehta
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2622-2622.
FULL TEXT  

Start Low, Go Slow, Is Not Always Best
Reinharth and Cohen
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2623-2623.
FULL TEXT  

Cohen vs PDR
Rohde
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2622-2623.
FULL TEXT  

Dose Discrepancies Between the Physicians' Desk Reference and the Medical Literature, and Their Possible Role in the High Incidence of Dose-Related Adverse Drug Events
Cohen
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:957-964.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.