You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 161 No. 7, April 9, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (23)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Dose Discrepancies Between the Physicians' Desk Reference and the Medical Literature, and Their Possible Role in the High Incidence of Dose-Related Adverse Drug Events

Jay S. Cohen, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:957-964.

Background  Adverse drug events (ADEs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and even minor ADEs may adversely affect patients' compliance with treatment. Because most ADEs are dose-related phenomena, adjusting drug dosages to account for individual patients' needs and tolerances is fundamental to good therapeutics.

Objective  To determine whether the Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR), the leading source of drug information for physicians, provides the full range of effective drug doses, especially the lowest, least ADE-prone doses of medications, for physicians to consider in treating patients.

Methods  Review of dosage guidelines and dose-response information in the PDR. Comparison with dose-response data obtained from articles listed in MEDLINE from 1966 to 2000.

Results  For many types of medications, physicians are frequently advised to use the lowest effective doses of drugs, especially initially. Yet, effective low doses determined in prerelease studies or in postrelease work are often omitted from the PDR, even when they have been recommended by expert panels.

Conclusions  Optimal therapeutics depends on the availability of comprehensive information. However, the PDR contains only the limited dose information from package inserts. Because the PDR was originally developed as a promotional device, there is no mechanism by which all clinically relevant dose-response data or important postrelease discoveries are regularly and rapidly incorporated into it. Thus, a gap exists in the availability of current and comprehensive dose information for physicians. This article provides information on lower, effective doses for 48 major medications, with an extensive reference list—a compilation of low-dose information not previously published, to our knowledge, in the medical literature. Physicians must have a readily accessible source of current and complete dose-response information to individualize drug therapy and minimize the risks of ADEs.


From the Departments of Family and Preventive Medicine and Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.


RELATED LETTERS

Start Low, Go Slow, Is Not Always Best
Daniel Reinharth and Jay S. Cohen
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(21):2623.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Sponsorship and Drug Information
Ethan M. Basch, Mark F. Bonfiglio, and Jay S. Cohen
Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(21):2625-2626.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Antidepressants: An Avoidable and Solvable Controversy
Cohen
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2004;38:1743-1746.
FULL TEXT  

Why Aren't Lower, Effective, OTC Doses Available Earlier by Prescription?
Cohen
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2003;37:136-142.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinician Use of a Palmtop Drug Reference Guide
Rothschild et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2002;9:223-229.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Start Low, Go Slow, Is Not Always Best
Reinharth and Cohen
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2623-2623.
FULL TEXT  

Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Sponsorship and Drug Information
Basch et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2625-2626.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.