You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 1, January 14, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (28)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Forecasting the Impact of a Clinical Practice Guideline for Perioperative {beta}-Blockers to Reduce Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality

Michael Schmidt, BS; Peter K. Lindenauer, MD, MSc; Jan L. Fitzgerald, MS, RN; Evan M. Benjamin, MD

Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:63-69.

Background  {beta}-Blockers reduce morbidity and mortality when administered to high-risk patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery, yet little is known about how often they are being prescribed. Clinical practice guidelines are tools that can be used to speed the translation of research into practice and may be one method to improve the use of {beta}-blockers. Before implementing any guideline, it is important to forecast its potential clinical and financial impact.

Methods  We conducted a retrospective cohort study, using administrative and medical record review data, of all adult patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery at Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Mass, during a 1-month period in 1999. Patients with 2 or more cardiac risk factors or with documented coronary artery disease were classified as high risk and were considered eligible for treatment with a {beta}-blocker if they had no obvious contraindications to its use. We estimated the potential clinical benefit of treating eligible patients with a {beta}-blocker by extrapolating the treatment effect observed in a previously reported randomized clinical trial.

Results  Of 158 patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery, 67 (42.4%) seemed to be ideal candidates for treatment with perioperative {beta}-blockers. Of these 67 patients, 25 (37%) received a {beta}-blocker at some time perioperatively. During the course of a year, we estimate that between 560 and 801 patients who do not receive {beta}-blockers might benefit from treatment with these medications. Full use of {beta}-blockers among eligible patients at our institution could result in 62 to 89 fewer deaths each year at an overall cost of $33 661 to $40 210.

Conclusions  There seems to be a large opportunity to improve the quality of care of patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery by increasing the use of {beta}-blockers in the perioperative period. A clinical practice guideline may be one method to achieve these goals at little cost.


From the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts at Amherst (Mr Schmidt); the Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston (Drs Lindenauer and Benjamin); and the Department of Medicine (Drs Lindenauer and Benjamin) and the Division of Healthcare Quality (Drs Lindenauer and Benjamin and Ms Fitzgerald), Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Internal Medicine Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(1):111.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

2009 ACCF/AHA Focused Update on Perioperative Beta Blockade Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery
American College of Cardiology Foundation et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;0:j.jacc.2009.07.010v1-15023.
FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery
Fleisher et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:e159-e242.
FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery)
Fleisher et al.
Circulation 2007;116:e418-e500.
FULL TEXT  

Should the ACC/AHA guidelines be changed in patients undergoing vascular surgery?
Hoeks et al.
Eur Heart J 2005;26:2358-2360.
FULL TEXT  

The Potential Preventability of Postoperative Myocardial Infarction: Underuse of Perioperative {beta}-Adrenergic Blockade
Lindenauer et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:762-766.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.